« Blog Home
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

Over the past few months I’ve twice been asked to appear as a pundit on the BBC World Service’s “Have your say” programme dealing with Barack Obama’s bid to become the Democratic Party’s nomination for the White House. In both cases the question of race and its effect on his candidacy was the pivotal point around which the debates revolved.

The timing of the first show coincided with the start of the Democratic primaries, around the time of Senator Hillary Clinton’s epiphany in a New Hampshire coffee shop when the wheels of her campaign appeared to be coming off. Despite her efforts to style the Obama campaign as slick and inexperienced, she was going backwards and fast.

Questions of her throwing in the towel started to surface with campaign managers quitting and even an insert on the Drudge Report that this might well be it. Was it a case of misogyny being worse than racism among American voters? Suddenly and unexpectedly, even to herself, the tears flowed and a stay of execution was granted by the electorate.

Yet despite all this, Obama continued to grow stronger and his appeal to a broad base of Democratic and Independent voters became self evident. The unthinkable became very thinkable — America was sending a strong signal — we are ready to elect our first black president.

Leaving aside that half of his parentage is white, including his cringeworthy granny, Barack Obama had shown that American voters were taking a quantum leap into virgin territory.

Which brings us to the second show, a couple of days ago, where the issue of race took on an entirely new and uglier complexion. Gone was the question of whether Americans would elect a black man and in its place was the issue of whether they would vote for a black man who had supported a radical black pastor who held views which were unpalatable to a sizeable portion of the white American voters.

Let’s take a step back to Obama’s speech on race and the Reverend Jeremiah Wright at Philadelphia which I dealt with in considerable detail at the time.

Not only was it a stunning address, but it dealt with issues in a way which will allow us to reach a greater understanding of the gulf that divides the races. As I said at the time, this speech, regardless of the outcome of the election, will stand the test of time. It truly echoed Nelson Mandela.

Moreover, it was Obama’s James Bond moment. Stirred, but not shaken, he took on all comers and did not abandon Wright.

He displayed incredible resolve and strength of character from a great president in the making.

Before I deal with Wright’s media blitz, which has occasioned severe damage to Obama, I would like to repeat that — a great president in the making. Nothing has changed save that his former pastor has gone to the local nuke dealer and bought some ICBM’s for Hillary Clinton to use against him.

This is unforgivable.

Wright started a weekend media blitz with a Friday night interview by Bill Moyes on PBS and then addressed the National Press Club in Washington on the Monday. He blamed America for 9/11 and said they were capable of releasing Aids to control minorities. He said blacks think with one part of the brain which made them more creative and whites with another, making them more logical. In toto, he gave the Clinton camp enough soundbites to make the claim that Obama, by association, had to be unelectable.

Needless to say, Obama was left with no alternative but to distance himself from Wright.

It is against this backdrop that the second BBC debate was entered.

Two of the pundits went to great lengths to point out the work that Wright had done and the era of segragation within which he grew up. They were at pains to point out that voters would not have reacted the same if it were a white clergyman relating to Clinton or McCain.

My point was this — of course what they are saying is right, but and it is a big, big but, Wright knew of the terrible damage he was occasioning Obama’s campaign.

In addition he knows that a president Obama could achieve enormous credibility, gains and leverage for the African American community, yet he carried on regardless. After all, if Obama can sit in the most powerful seat in the world what can’t an African American do?

Yet despite all this, he elected to go and make the case for Clinton that electing Obama is tantamount to bringing the views of Wright to the White House.

God damn America?

It is irrelevant what Wright has done before and when he grew up, or even the hardship he suffered, when he stands on the brink of setting the African American cause back at least a decade. If he claims to have their interests at heart what possessed him to inflict this act of sabotage? What purpose, other than Clinton’s, did he serve? Everything he said was well known in the media as the feelings of African Americans. Obama offered voters a paradigm shift — that the black versus white take on policy could become one take against those who exploited all Americans for themselves.

Of course it is unfair for Obama to take the rap for Wright. Unfortunately he did, somehow survived and witnessed, in what I can only imagine was horror, as Wright grabbed for the brass ring of public attention again. Can he survive it again? This will fall to the superdelegates and if they are courageous and wise enough to hand him the Democratic baton, the American people as the Republican machinery comes into play.

Just as an aside — if that does come to pass I would pay to see a debate between Pat Robertson and Jeremiah Wright. Bonfire of the insanities?

We all know that the American Constitution provides for a division between church and state. Whether the American voter can make that distinction between Obama and Wright, only time will tell. One thing this election will show us on the issue of race is how far America has come and how far she still has to go.

Let us pray it’s one small step for America and one quantum leap for mankind.




Related Posts
  • None

17 Responses to “Barack Obama and the race for the White House”

Well Traps, inso far as the superdelegate count is concerned it would seem they realise the danger that is Wright and have done well to separate this “performance” from the Obama campaign. The Obama campaign is closing in on the superdelegate count, even during the times of the Wright soundbites, the “bitter”gates and other gaffes. The former chairman of the DNC, whose political career was enhanced by the Clintons has switched to the Obama campaign. Obama has the nomination clinched (discounting Florida and Michigan). What Wright wishes to prove is that America will never elect a black man as president and unfortunately the whole of America (not just black as some would have us believe) is proving him wrong. At least for the first in history a black man will run for presidency of America

(Report abuse)

Velabahleke on May 1st, 2008 at 11:16 pm

Good article. What do you think about todays news of people changing camps in the democratic party?
Cheers,
me
www.dreamzfulfilled.com

(Report abuse)

methetool on May 2nd, 2008 at 5:22 am

The Democrats are starting to realise that this protracted debate, with all the dirt being thrown by their candidates at each other, is starting to become a problem in the context of the main battle ie Democrats versus Republicans.

What some of the super-delegates are saying is that by continuing this battle we may be handing this to the Republicans come election time.

They are not wrong nor alone in this thinking. Many analysts, for awhile now, have been asking how long this can be allowed to continue.

That is why people like Joe Andrew former NDC chairman and appointed by Bill Clinton have crossed over to the Obama camp and told other super-delegates to follow.

(Report abuse)

Michael Trapido on May 2nd, 2008 at 12:18 pm

Good article. I wonder why Wright would do something like that? I’m betting (if it continues?) that someone somewhere from the Clinton camp has paid him..it’s USA after all, politics and corruption go hand in hand (they would fit into Africa easily!)…

(Report abuse)

LG on May 2nd, 2008 at 1:30 pm

God save us from four more years of insincerity and billary.

(Report abuse)

Alan on May 2nd, 2008 at 1:54 pm

Okay, this is obviously heartfelt and passionate. Too bad that you can’t count on the U.S. populace to be so idealistic. The general populace just votes on gut feel and right now, that gut feel is not in Obama’s favor. So the question is, do the superdelegates do something idealistic or realistic? Personally, I feel to save lives we need to get somebody that has a realistic chance of winning and, unfortunately, that is not Obama.

(Report abuse)

Judy R on May 2nd, 2008 at 2:33 pm

The nomination is clearly within Obama’s grasp and surely Wright must have realised that his comments could only be damaging. Why then did he do it?
Could it be that Wright’s hatred is so deep seated that it has impaired his judgement to the point that he does not care if he damages African American interests. Alternatively, maybe he believes that Obama will bring about the type of reconciliation which makes his anti USA diatribes irrelevant. He could be out of a job.

For my part I am inclined to the view that Wright is simply a very stupid man. Unfortunately Obama has allowed his attachment to this religous demagogue to cloud his judgement and this could cost him the presidency even if he wins the nomination. You are judged by the company you keep

(Report abuse)

anton kleinschmidt on May 2nd, 2008 at 3:36 pm

Yes, Traps, I agree. You should notice in my earlier comment I excluded Florida and Michigan. Of course you know that with these states included the clinton campaign is claiming to be ahead in the popular vote. I wonder, and you probably have written on this, how commentators (outside of the US) feel these should be treated, with all the factors included. Can to comment or point me to suggestions around this issues?

(Report abuse)

Velabahleke on May 2nd, 2008 at 8:04 pm

When all the dust has settled and there’s another white man or woman in the Oval Office, do you ever think that Reverend Wright might sit back in his La-Z-Boy recliner and reflect on the fact that his vitriolic racist utterings torpedoed Obama’s candidacy?

(Report abuse)

Jon on May 2nd, 2008 at 11:05 pm

Well, Traps you’ve proven again that you really epitomize the quality of writing/reasoning we expect from contributors to “Thought Leader” forum. You have pinpointed the the conundrum posed by the Rev. Wright for Senator Obama and for all of us (outside the Clinton camp); why did he do it? I hesitate to call him stupid; what he demonstrates is the difference between being clever and being smart. What he has done is not SMART regardless of his motives. One may rightly suspect anger and revenge for perceived slights by Obama repudiating his original remarks. However, again, why should the American electorate demand that Mr. Obama carry Wright’s cross on his shoulders. This guilt by association is like a cancer in the American psyche,and then throw in racism on top of that and you have a volatile mixture of bigotry and ignorance which seem to typify the actions of the electorate. They are not voting on the issues or principles but on gut feelings of likes and dislikes; innuendo; rumour and manipulation.
But what has epitomized the tragedy of this election process is the utter irresponsibility of the American media and their blatantly biased journalists and pundits. Just last night a granny supporter of Clinton’s on CNN disdainfully called Mr Obama: “Obama bin Laden” and the interviewer did not reprimand her but just laughed it off a-la-Hillary. The American public is sadly betrayed by a media that refuse to educate the masses. They have become cheer leaders for whoever is their current favourite and will focus on any trivia guaranteed to boost ratings.
It’s gratifying to see that the comments thus far have focused on the main points raised by your article and they are right on. Of course the usual naysayers may still be typing away their sometimes irrelevant diatribes.

Good show Traps.

Joe Manyoni, Canada.

(Report abuse)

Prof. Joe Manyoni on May 4th, 2008 at 4:00 am

Wright has done it again - and Obama has dumped him.

I think Wright WANTS Obama to loose - helps confirm his prejudices? Jealousy ? Trying to build up a cult for himself? Anther narcissist perhaps?

(Report abuse)

Lyndall Beddy on May 4th, 2008 at 5:23 pm

Now with Hillary Clinton almost out of the
race the Americans have a change to elect
their first Black President. The question is
do they have the courage of their conviction
or is Obama doomed to join the many of also has
run?

(Report abuse)

Cool Down on May 8th, 2008 at 10:45 pm

Wright has all the right to feel anger at being used by Obama for twenty years as a mere stepping stone for his political ambitions, especially as Wright is a very political animal himself. It must feel like a terrible betrayal that Obama has been sitting in the pews all that time, pretending to be in agreement with his racist views, apparently only to mislead the black community into believing that he really was as black as them.

(Report abuse)

Will on May 9th, 2008 at 10:00 am

Prof Joe writes: “This guilt by association is like a cancer in the American psyche,and then throw in racism on top of that and you have a volatile mixture of bigotry and ignorance which seem to typify the actions of the electorate.”

The problem is that Obama has sought out the pastor precisely because he was known as the most radical preacher on Chicago’s south side and then he willingly continued to associate himself with Wright’s church for twenty years. Obama’s guilt is far more than association - it’s more like endorsement.

(Report abuse)

Will on May 9th, 2008 at 11:10 am

Cool Down, let’s understand one thing. Hillary Rodham Clinton (senator from New York) and Barack Obama (senator from Illinois) are in a contest for who is to be the nominee for their party, the Domecratic Party, in the presidential election which is to held in November. The other major party has already decided, using the same primary process, on their presidential candidate, John McCain (senior republican senator from Arizona). There likely will be other candidates for presidency from other smaller parties or independents that did not necessarily go through the primary processes, but had to pass some tests, like to prove they can sustain a campain, etc..etc… One of the Baldwin brothers (I forget which) has just hinted that he might run for presidency. It still remains to be seen whether he is intends running this year.

Yes, Barack Obama has more pledged delegates, and it seems unlikely that HRC will ever overtake him but there is still the issue of Florida and Michigan which HRC won, but there is a reason why these two states don’t (or not counting now) count and I’m sure you have been keeping abreast of these issues and are well aware of the goings on.

If Barack becomes the nominee (as most of us believe he will), he will be the first black presidential candidate. The other black candidates such as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and others have never been party nominees and in the true sense have never been presidential candidates.

Now whether America is ready to elect their first African-American or even Women for that matter president is another question.

The concerns with Barack Obama is that he is inexperienced, which indeed is true, he is the first term senator after one other term in the Illinois state senate. He’s not been doing well with the largest group of American voters, the working class american (some color collar, I forget which?). But these voters are generally the base of the Democratic party and it is hard to imagine them voting the conservatives (republicans) whose policies are usually not so favourable to them, come November. If he becomes the nominee his choice of VP becomes very crucial, in winning this constituency. Some names have been suggested, Governor Rendell of Philadelphia (a HRC supporter) and HRC herself.

However, I do not think race will be the issue here though. I remind you that the independent candidate tends to compete for the same votes as the Democratic Party.

To me it would seem the Americans are now ready to cross the color or gender divide and hire the best “man” for the job, and I respect them for this.

(Report abuse)

Velabahleke on May 9th, 2008 at 12:14 pm

It seems that even white racialists are supporting Obama for president: http://www.vdare.com/bradley/080505_obama.htm

(Report abuse)

Will on May 9th, 2008 at 12:38 pm

Wright’s church does a lot of good work amongst the poor of the South Side of Chicago. And through their(, Barack and Wright) association and cooperation in projects they collaborated-in for the projects (see the 70’s show Good Times), Wright helped Barack find God. Barack was not necessarily an atheist but had an intellectual mother who through her travels around the world questioned the nature of God as described in traditional religion. How could God let people of the world starve and suffer so, if he loved all people equally, I imagine from time to time she would ask herself. Wright put things together and into perspective for Barack, blaming America for all that is bad in the meantime.

This is not to say Barack has never been critical of Wright. He has. He disinvited Wright when he was anouncing he was entering the race “together with 15000 of his closest friends”. But the bond they shared for the work they did for the poor was far greater. Remember also the Wright sound bites, like the story of Prof Bill Ayers only became an issue and pronounced when it became clear that the smear tactics of having Barack merely described as a “black candidate” failed. These soundbites came largely from a conservative media like Fox’s Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly and the likes of Rush Limbaugh on radio. Some of these soundbites are as old as seven years “The chicken are coming home to roost” and others even older but only now do they really find airtime.

These conservative pundits are trying to clean their image after what seemed like an attempt to put a good candidate down and hence making appear as if they some Barack. Barack is very weary and aware of the “Bradley effect” particularly after New Hampshire.

Barack didn’t play to popular politics and disowned his pastor when everybody wanted him to, during his Philadelphia race speech. Infact he equated him to his own white grandmother. The recent events are different. Wright had any right to defend and explain himself, but he came out and he didn’t do that. He attacked Barack. You might remember his performance explaining why he couldn’t have been Barack’s spiritual mentor. This was just pure lights, camera action for him. Barack had only one option left to him. Disavow the hypocrite. Wright wants to continue blaming America, and he knows how committed a community worker Barack is and with Barack in the helm, these arguments might loose a place in American politics.

Indeed Barack is Black, but there is no way any candidate running on race basis can win the election. This is to say the reason Clinton is winning over middle class America is because of the history and the memory they have of Clinton administration. These voters are almost similar to black poor who even though it is clear the ANC doesn’t think highly of them, they still vote the ANC because of the stability and the peace the ANC is giving them. Crime was already here. The other races in South Africa are only feeling it more because the police which protected them exclusively is spread thin and shared with the other races.

(Report abuse)

Velabahleke on May 9th, 2008 at 11:47 pm

Leave a Reply

All comments must be approved by our editors, click here to read the editorial guidelines for comments. Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.

Send me the Thought Leader daily newsletter

We have put a word limit of 250 words on all your comments


words left

profile
Mike Trapido is editor of NewsTime

By trade a criminal attorney he is now a full time editor and journalist.

He was born in Johannesburg and attended HA Jack and Highlands North High Schools.

He married Robyn in 1984 (Mrs Traps, aka "the government") and has three sons (who all look suspiciously like her ex-boss).

He was a counsellor on the JCCI for a year around 1992.

His passions include Derby County, Blue Bulls, Orlando Pirates, Proteas and Springboks.

He takes Valium in order to cope with Bafana Bafana's results.

Tell a Friend Technorati RSS
more posts
African National Congress secretary-general Gwede Mantashe in a report in The Star newspaper on Friday called upon newspaper editors to join the debat...
The African National Congress Youth League in the Eastern Cape confirmed yesterday that it would be convening a congress in the province despite there...
One of the most fascinating aspects of the Brett Kebble murder trial in the South Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg is the fact that the accused, Gle...
Just when African National Congress Youth League President Julius Malema believed he had an iron grip on the Limpopo province following the banishing ...
The undertaking by Justice Minister Jeff Radebe, in his address to the SA National Editors' Forum in Johannesburg on Saturday night, that the governme...
latest activity
Blog Statistics
Total reads 145399
Total comments 19593
Michael's tags
advertisement
    Mail & Guardian Online Headlines
  • National
  • Business
  • Africa
  • World
  • Sport
All material copyright of the author, or the Mail & Guardian, unless otherwise specified
Author Login
Afrigator