« Blog Home
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

(This piece originally appeared on tonylankester.com)

South African blogger Donn Edwards is being sued for libel by a timeshare company called Quality Vacation Club (QVC) after he wrote of his experience with the company. I have no axe to grind with the timeshare industry. But if they bend the rules and dupe people into buying things they don’t want, then they should be exposed.

But this post isn’t about the rights and wrongs of Donn’s case or the relative sleaziness of those who employ dodgy means to sell timeshare. What worries me, as someone who from time to time vents online about bad or downright shady service they get from someone, is the prospect of the floodgates being opened for litigation from any big corporate who is feeling hard done by or belittled by a blogger. This is going to be an interesting test case for South African online journalism and free speech.

But there’s another angle to this. Bloggers are quick to demand the same rights afforded other media and citizens, to jump up and down if they feel they are being silenced or muzzled in some way. However, they are less quick to adopt some of the practices the other media use to ensure that, in exercising their right to free speech, they also adopt the principles of fairness and balance.

In a newspaper, radio or TV newsroom there are gatekeepers. People who read copy, scanning it for any hint of inaccuracy or looming lawsuits. By the time the story is aired or published, there’s a reasonable chance it is accurate. And when it is not, the industry self-regulates. Apologies, retractions and corrections follow. Given how much news is generated every single day, the fact that lawsuits are few and far between shows that the system works. (Although some still lie awake and worry.)

But in the blogosphere no such gatekeepers exist. The only “reason check” sits between the bloggers brain and their fingers. Ranting, typing and publishing is all too easy. The problem is that many bloggers are picking and choosing the bits of the practice of conventional journalism that suit them, and ignore the bits that don’t. And then they hide behind “free speech”. But with Google, RSS feeds and Trackbacks, whatever you write on your blog is going to stick around far longer than what is printed in a newspaper, which is destined to wrap fish and chips tomorrow. And blogs have a potential audience far wider. So, if anything, bloggers should be more cautious than “traditional” news journalists.

I have zero sympathy for the timeshare companies. And Donn Edwards seems to have written an honest and factual, albeit one-sided, report on his experience with them. And he’s already won in the court of public opinion. But he was never going to lose there, was he? If it looks like a rat, smells like a rat and walks like a rat then, yes, everyone agrees that it is probably a timeshare salesman. And legal opinion quoted in the Sunday Independent suggests that Donn will prevail in court. Which, in turn, implies that QVC (who presumably have been told that by their phalanx of lawyers) are merely flexing their muscles and bullying Donn. In so doing I think they have grossly underestimated the blogosphere and the damage they are doing to their own brand – which is way more than, ironically, they are suing Donn for. So, in this instance, I hope that he sticks it out and wins the battle and doesn’t settle out of court.

But there’s a warning in his experience that all bloggers, myself included, should heed. If you’re going to play in the sandpit of journalism, learn all the rules. Even if you plan on breaking them. At least learn from the dozens of court cases that have preceded you. Just because the online world is on screen only, it doesn’t mean that the real world laws of defamation and libel don’t apply. And just because you are your own headline writer, journalist, copy editor, editor and publisher, it doesn’t mean you have latitude to ignore the basic courtesies, practices and principles of good journalism.

And, actually, the rules can make for more compelling and convincing writing. A while ago I blogged about an experience I had at the Constantia branch of Woolworths. I wrote up the piece, appended the photographs I intended using and sent it to the Woolworths media office before I clicked “Publish”. They responded well – giving me time to talk to some of their senior staff who could address my issues. They were open and honest (adopting the corporate PR mantra “Tell the truth. Tell it fast. Tell it well.”). It didn’t stop me publishing or using the photographs, but I was able to amend what I had written to be fairer to them, to reflect their views, and a whole new angle to the story emerged that was, frankly, more interesting than what I had written in the first place.

And if you don’t learn from any of that, take a lesson from the doyenne of fair play. I was fortunate once to work with the late Isabel Jones – every consumer’s champion and every sleazeball’s worst nightmare. She was a remarkable woman – tenacious and tiny, with the demeanour of Jessica Fletcher until she was patronised or rubbed up the wrong way by someone in a shiny suit and white shoes. She was happiest when she was being chased down the street by spanner wielding mechanics, cameras rolling and microphones live. Those who watched her on TV or listened to her on radio actually had the wrong impression of Isabel. They thought – because she wanted them to think – that she was a no holds barred, pull no punches street fighter. She wasn’t. She was equally quick to spike a story or stop reporting on it if she felt that the company under the microscope was unfairly coming out of it badly. Sometimes consumers are simply stupid. And they would threaten and argue with people, and misrepresent their story to get Isabel on side. She had no time for that. Were she alive today I would have loved for her to have a blog. And she would have done it well. She was never hysterical. She was always questioning herself as harshly as she questioned those across the desk from her. She was her own gatekeeper. And no one messed with her. See – one person working solo can do it. So should we all.




Related Posts

9 Responses to “What would Isabel do?”

Oh my, I actually remember watching Isabel Fletcher when I was a kid.

Too bad we don’t have someone of her quality out there anymore.

(Report abuse)

Fatima on December 4th, 2008 at 12:00 am

A lot of bloggers won’t agree with what you wrote here, but I do.

Bloggers have a responsibility when they write and some would flippantly dismiss that.

(Report abuse)

Richard Catto on December 4th, 2008 at 8:42 am

I agree with you about bloggers being their own gatekeepers. But at the same time the world has changed and corporates must realise that bully-boy tactics no longer cut it. Gone are the days when you could intimidate the small guy with no-one ever hearing about it. Bloggers hold a great deal of power since they have a large number of enthusiastic interactive readers.

Unlike the Woolworths example you gave, it appears QVC gave Donn the runaround, first inviting him to a meeting in Pretoria - expecting him to waste his time and money getting there - and then changing times and venues until finally slapping him with R461000 suit (now upped to R1500000). Whatever happens they’re now the bad guys in the eyes of the public.

Kragdaadigheid is bad business.

(Report abuse)

Timbo on December 4th, 2008 at 11:40 am

Law suits are nothing like what you see on TV. They are like playing chess by postcard, and it is not much fun. I didn’t go looking for this lawsuit, but now it is no longer about what I blogged.

Stay away from legal hassles if you can. The most difficult part of this process is being ready to spike stories you are proud of, even if you still think you are right.

If you can get someone else to review your articles before you publish them, do so. I have a rule for email: NEVER press the SEND button while you are still angry. There is no UNSEND button. The same is true for blogs: there is no “unpublish” button.

(Report abuse)

Donn Edwards on December 4th, 2008 at 1:26 pm

First, to business: I will never use QUALITY VACATION CLUB (QVC) - EVER! And that’s without knowing much about the case. Suing a blogger, indeed!!
see: http://guymclaren.com/is-calling-people-and-telling-them-they-have-won-a-prize-a-scam/
to see what scumbag methods QVC uses.

Second: Good post! You are right that we need to think, and we must remain good citizens - BUT:

Third, and most important:
Bloggers and internet users MUST push the envelope, and we MUST hold companies to greater account than in the past.

Let’s follow this case and any others and let the corporate world know that we talk, and we talk online. Where bloggers make mistakes, companies could contact the blogger, get right of reply, and a quick correction should suffice.
But bullying should be withstood with great determination.

In the meantime: DOWN WITH QUALITY VACATION CLUB!

(Report abuse)

pete ess on December 4th, 2008 at 4:44 pm

I think what you have said is very true. And I must say that I often review my experiences on my blog and have had some fabulous constructive commentary from the companies in question aiming to address my criticism and correct things (Standard Bank) or just thank me for a good review (a few restaurants).

I think blogging reviews should be used by companies in the same way that they use Hello Peter to address issues/compliments/complaints. Because, I don’t think there’s a blogger out there who, if they weren’t wholly satisfied with something and blogged about the experience, wouldn’t write up the story when the company-in-question constructively responded. Which can turn a negative experience into good publicity instead of bad (like a court case).

(Report abuse)

phillygirl on December 9th, 2008 at 7:56 am

[…] the most insightful comment came from Tony Lankester. There’s a warning in his experience that all bloggers, myself included, should heed. If […]

(Report abuse)


[…] the most insightful comment came from Tony Lankester. There’s a warning in his experience that all bloggers, myself included, should heed. If […]

(Report abuse)


They wouldn’t have messed with Isabel because she would have eaten them as a before breakfast snack, and used their bones to pick her teeth afterwards.

(Report abuse)

NINA BLAIR on April 24th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

Leave a Reply

All comments must be approved by our editors, click here to read the editorial guidelines for comments. Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.

Send me the Thought Leader daily newsletter

We have put a word limit of 250 words on all your comments


words left

profile
Tony is a corporate animal but it wasn't always so. He used to work in the media, with a specific interest in technology; travel; music; and getting free stuff. He doesn't consider himself a thought leader, although he does confess to having thoughts. He presents the M&G's weekly podcast.
Tell a Friend Technorati RSS
Tony's links
more posts
Possibly the most famous newspaper headline blunder was made by the Chicago Tribune of November 3 1948, which bannered “Dewey Defeats Truman”. ...
(This piece first appeared on tonylankester.com) I’m usually pretty open-minded when it comes to reading or hearing the views of foreign journalis...
(This post first appeared on tonylankester.com) Sometimes writing a blog entry is hard work. Occasionally, though, someone gives you material -- an...
Some time back I heard of a group of people on the internet who were spending their time creating graphs of songs titles and lyrics and posting them o...
(This post first appeared on my own blog, www.tonylankester.com) Every time you turn the television on these days you get more talking heads crunch...
latest activity
Blog Statistics
Total reads 40120
Total comments 273
Tony's tags
advertisement
    Mail & Guardian Online Headlines
  • National
  • Business
  • Africa
  • World
  • Sport
All material copyright of the author, or the Mail & Guardian, unless otherwise specified
Author Login
Afrigator