Thought Leader » Ivo Vegter » White supremacists, begone!…

I think you’re wrong, that you variously misrepresent history, mistate cause and effect, mistake correlation with causation, and misunderstand human nature. But more importantly, I don’t care.

That’s not a concession, nor a capitulation, nor a demand for political correctness.

Even if I did think my race, nationality or gender were superior to those of anyone else, such claims would not convince anyone with half a brain of the points I have to make. So I wouldn’t stoop to doing so. And I’m not interested in the arguments of those who do.

You can find it on http://www.davidduke.com

with all the affilliations and histories included.

Its called The Historical Roots of “Political Correctness” By Raymond V. Raehn

PC seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behavior on all and is therefore totalitarian in nature.

Critical Theory on which PC is based is essentially destructive criticism of the main elements of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism.

Terms like white supremacist, nazi, racist etc are used to suggest that the presence in a society of Christianity, capitalism and the patriarchal-authoritarian family created a character prone to racial prejudice and German fascism.

Traditional beliefs and the existing social structure have to be destroyed and then replaced.

As a grand scheme it is intended to deny the intrinsic worth of white, heterosexual males by the use of guilt in order to upset the social order.

When addressing the general public, advocates of Political Correctness – or cultural Marxism, to give it its true name – present their beliefs attractively. It’s all just a matter of being “sensitive” to other people, they say. They use words such as “tolerance” and “diversity,” asking, “Why can’t we all just get along?”

The reality is different. Political Correctness is not at all about “being nice,” . Political Correctness is Marxism, with all that implies: loss of freedom of expression, thought control, inversion of the traditional social order and, ultimately, a totalitarian state.

Sorry that your ‘Spike’ got a bit blunted
against our ‘racists shields’ and likewise
don’t take it personally.

Regarding blaming russian communism on the russian people consider this:

Karl Marx (born Levi) and another Jew, Friedreich Engels, issued “The Communist Manifesto” in 1848 in London. Marx was descended from a long line of famous Rabbis who were so-called “Talmudic scholars.”

Vladimir Lenin was of Jewish Ancestry as were approximately 95% of the Communists in both the Bolshevik and Menshevik Parties.

LENIN said (From an article in Northern Pravda, October-December 1913) about the communist party, ” the percentage of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the percentage of Jews in the general population.

In the first government of Communist Russia there were only 13 ethnic Russian Commissars and more than 300 Jewish Commissars out of a total of 384 Commissars. The billionaire New York Jew Jacob Schiff was the revolution’s chief financier. Jews were 1.7% of the population of Russia. Of the 6 members of Lenin’s first Politburo, three were Jews, Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev, top five leaders were Jews.”

The Jewish Telegraph Agency of May 14, 1997, said the Jews “…played key roles in ushering Communist rule into Hungary. In fact, during the brutal oppression of the early 1950s, the regime’s top 5 leaders were Jews.

The Kibbutz communes in Israel shows the only people in the world which have voluntarily adopted communal living and is run by marxists. They operate many farms and factories. It is of interest that they are always millions in debt and must be bailed out constantly with U.S. Foreign Aid money.

Regarding the economic policies of the national socialists:

In 1933, Germany was the European country with the bleakest future; possibly no country in the world had worse prospects. Germany was technically bankrupt with no likelihood of rehabilitation. The reasons for this were many and varied:

Massive unemployment
Industrial stagnation
Crippling strike actions by unions
Private investment had fallen to one sixth
Collapse in agricultural prices
Escalating numbers of bankrupt companies
Total earnings had fallen by half
90% of the German people were in dire straits
The Versailles treaty confiscated the richest mineral land and imposed escalating debt repayments that would not be lifted for fifty years.
Communists, funded by the Soviet Union, were taking advantage of the political turmoil with frequent strike action and violent abortive coups.

By the end of NS’s first year in office unemployment had fallen from 6,000,000 to 3,374,000. An unprecedented 2,627,000 jobs had been created at a time when the rest of the world was in deep eceonomic recession.

In 1932, before National Socialism acquired power, the German national income amounted to 45.2 milliard Reichsmarks…. and in 1937 reached the round figure of 68 milliard Reichsmarks. In contrast to this increase in income the general cost of living index remained practically unchanged. In other words, while the national income increased by nearly 50% the increase in the general cost of living rose by only 4%.”

Five years of National Socialist industrial and economic activity show that:

Paper manufacture increased by 50%
The manufacture of diesel oil increased by 66%
The production of coal increased by 68%
The production of oil fuel increased by 80%
The production of mineral oil increased by 90%
The production of artificial silk increased by 100%
The production of Kerosene has increased by 110%
The production of steel has increased by 167%
The production of lubricating oil increased by 190%

Like cool down, however, you seem to take my comments suspiciously personally, so I think it’s safe to assume that you’re cut from the same cloth.

And no, cool down, my comments weren’t aimed at those who don’t agree with me. My comments were aimed at racists of the Stormfront.org variety. Perhaps I’m wrong. Perhaps God is a White Nationalist, and racism is morally superior to my own craven left-liberal mud-blood philosophy. But in my opinion, SF constitutes a filthy crevice, and I don’t particularly want to listen to the racist rants that crawl out of it every time I’m critical of the ANC.

No wonder the ANC thinks anyone who criticises it is just a racist bigot. They way you lot carry on, they appear justified in using that as a blanket shield against any and all attacks.

Now if you’ll excuse me, this has gone on long enough. I have a shady deal involving a black man, a corrupt front company, a BEE deal and the ANC to write about. And you’ll have to forgive me for doing so without implying that blacks can’t run countries or companies, but limiting myself to elementary political philosophy and economic theory.

They make the claim they cant stand being around racists. In reality they cannot refute the racists. How many ‘non racists’ have claimed on this thread alone that our facts are always correct and we are often right and make better logical arguements, even though they dont like the conclusions? We also dont get emotional and make rants like ‘filthy crevices’ etc.

Only very few, like oldfox, try to counter with facts without hysteria. But even oldfox seems to have taken a turn to the right these days.

So as long as we see BS being paraded as intellect, pussy footing around issues where race is important for fear of the ‘racist’ tag we will continue to speak until deleted.

Apartheid is not to blame as nations that never had it are still failures. Why is the crime rate and welfare rate of ‘african-americans’ so high?

In German it would be Ohne Wittmanne laeuft nichts mehr.