Assume I have no conscience or any morals. Assume I have a legitimately registered company or CC with hefty overdraft facilities. Here I am in South Africa just ready to make a buck from those most gullible of consumers — the worried (but wealthy) well, the health and wellness neurotics, the painted, dyed and cosmetic-dependent clientele of “natural” medicine.
The illiterate and physiology-information-deprived usually don’t have much spare disposable income, so any diffusion of their resources into my pockets would simply be an added bonus.
I’ve found an overseas manufacturer of a sure-fire best-seller in SA — “Taller-brand” height-increase pills. (Read: “weight-loss remedies”; “hair-growth enhancers”; “bust-enlargement medications”; “penis-enlargement tablets”; “improved sexual-performance capsules”; “immune boosters”; etc.) I just need to import the product, start marketing it, sit back and wait for the rands to roll in.
I would, however, have some red-tape hurdles to jump through. (These minor obstacles could possibly be helped along with a few “tokens of appreciation”.)
1. I would state that the product is a natural “nutritional [or dietary] supplement” on all official documentation, especially customs, and thereby hopefully avoid any need to interact with the inspectors of the Medicines Regulatory Affairs (MRA) Cluster of the Department of Health (DoH). However, as Director General of Health Thami Mseleku has stated to Parliament’s health portfolio committee, there is a lack of capacity in inspections — so the chances are I’d get away with it anyway.
2. I would then submit an abbreviated application to the Medicines Control Council (MCC) for registration of my product as part of the 2002 Complementary Medicines “call-up”. This simple procedure would add my product to the over 20 000 applications said to have already been received by the MCC as of September 2006. Even though the call-up was for six months only, the applications have continued unabated — partly in order to obtain a NAPPI code (see below). A simple acknowledgement of receipt with an allocated application number, would enable me, albeit falsely, to advertise my product as being “registered with the MCC”.
3. I would apply for a NAPPI (National Pharmaceutical Product/Pricing Index) code — so that your medical aid will pay for the product or at least make part of the payment. Fortunately NAPPI codes are free: you just fill in the forms, show proof of registration of your company, show that you have the correct licences or registration from the MCC/Pharmacy Council (not too difficult to obtain);,and send along a copy of the label showing the ingredients. (The person/computer allocating the NAPPI code will probably not check the label for prohibited or scheduled substances, and would possibly not even be qualified to do so.) I would have little concern about how the purchase of my product and/or similar products would affect medical aid tariffs in general
.
4. I would find a tame/shady pharmacist or medic friend who would agree to substantiate that the product works [doctors were amazed at how much taller I became within a few weeks of taking “Taller-brand” pills!], just in case anyone submits a complaint to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).
5. I would advertise widely using obfuscatory phrases such as “helps to”, “improves”, “alleviates”, “supports”, or “assists the body with”. No specific or definitive claim such as cures short stature, or treats the vertically challenged etc. As none of the print or electronic media seem to have any ethical problems about accepting advertisements of this genre, I would have free reign until or unless someone complained to the ASA. Even then, my substantiation would probably be accepted by the ASA (provided my tame/shady pharmacist/medic’s credentials are accepted — usually not a problem). As the ASA does not have anyone in its own structures who can assess medical or health-related claims [no, really!], if my expert says it’s so, this “substantiation” must, according to the advertising code, be accepted as correct (no matter how absurd the claim). After that, a long, drawn out process of appeals, allegations of breaches of the code, and/or arbitration would ensure that I could cover legal fees and continue selling and profiting for months or even years — while the media continue to accept my advertising.
6. For my website, I would find a research article in any obscure journal that shows that the product (or just one ingredient) makes use of previously unused or unknown technology, which technology may have been endorsed by a Nobel Prize winner or person of similar stature. Molecular-structure hypotheses, laboratory tests and animal studies, rather than clinical trials with humans, would of course be emphasised. Extrapolations to living human beings can always be fudged. Besides which, none of the target market are likely to question “science”.
7. I would find a salesperson oozing with charm, and in possession of a degree or diploma of some sort. This person could intercalate doses of scientific-sounding verbiage with common sense, and smoothly spout these, making the product appear highly credible. For example:
The Earth we grow our food in is now so deficient in nutrients — especially vitamins, minerals and antioxidants — that the produce of that soil (or an animal that eats food growing in it) is similarly deficient. And this is why people are no longer growing as tall (retaining their hair, developing as large breasts or penises, enjoying sex, living as long) as they could. But science is here to help! Researchers have found a completely safe and natural revolutionary new product that has been shown to increase a person’s height (lose weight, grow hair, enlarge breasts or penises, improve sex, counteract ageing) within weeks.
If the product cannot make claims of being revolutionary, it can easily be legitimised through claims of “traditional” use (even if this vague term applies to but one of multiple ingredients in a newly formulated product): e.g. contains an indigenous herb, found only in a remote/secret area (of an exotic island), traditionally used for hundreds or even thousands of years as part of religious ceremonies. No one will notice that the concentration of the herb may have been so highly diluted (for cost-saving measures) that any possible purported efficacy is completely nullified.
8. I would organise advertorial interviews on radio talk shows, and perhaps even on SABC3’s 3 Talk with “gifts” for those who call in. (The presenter’s unique ability to somewhat gushingly endorse rather dubious products and their accompanying smooth and rather dubious sales personae, especially those from the UK, is legendary.)
9. I would arrange that only “leading pharmacies” stock the product. All non-leading pharmacies would not be able to stock it — but any so-called “health shop” could carry it.
10. I would start a distribution network locally (with a view to an international network, of course) whereby ordinary citizens are brainwashed into an uncritical belief in the product and, in line with the government’s encouragement of small businesses, are encouraged to find their own customers and create their own micro-distribution networks. (This is not a pyramid scheme!) With “trickle-up” economics, I would benefit every time a new customer is found.
Any concerns a person may have about the quality of my product will most likely remain unanswered for many long years. The magic number of 20 000 complementary medicines, which the spokesperson for the DoH cited again in July 2007, means my product’s application will wait its turn to be assessed. Since 2002, 14 000 products have been “assessed” according to the spokesperson. (In the ten months between the spokesperson’s two virtually identical statements, it would appear that no significant progress was made in assessing these products.)
Contradicting the MCC’s own website that the Medicines Act applies to all medicines, including complementary medicines, the director general stated to the health portfolio committee that complementary medicines do not need to be registered. The Democratic Alliance’s Mike Waters, however, seems to have inside knowledge that my product would be checked for “content, source of origin and presence of heavy metals, dangerous substances and banned substances” by the MRA.
Thank goodness this is not true. If it were, my product would be a non-starter. My own sources indicate that the “assessment” referred to by the DoH spokesperson involves nothing more than the listing of a few administrative details about each product in a database. Earlier this year, I found numerous products containing prohibited (”banned”/”illegal”) substances being advertised on South African websites, that had not been detected by the MRA in its assessment process. It is perhaps not surprising that the majority of these products were sexual-enhancement products.
Considering it’s taken more than five years to “assess” 14 000 products and assuming that the total number has increased (some say there are now over 60 000 products on the market), and because there’s no capacity according to the DG, it’s surely going to take many, many years before any official ever gets to take even a glance at the “labelled” (not necessarily actual) ingredients of my product. It could well contain nothing more than finely ground silica dioxide( sand) bound with starch. There’s nothing quite as natural as plain sand! But by then it wouldn’t matter — I’d have made my money several times over.
When aircraft cannot produce documentation to show they’ve been correctly maintained, they are grounded. There’s an independent body — the Civil Aviation Authority — checking on aircraft.
When condoms are found to be defective, they are recalled. There’s an independent body — the South African Bureau of Standards — checking on condoms.
When defects or new risks related to registered (orthodox, Western, allopathic) medicines are found, they are recalled, withdrawn or have their registration cancelled. The MCC is the independent body that checks on (registered) medicines. The self-monitoring of a product, once registered, is only possible because of the rigorous requirements of registration — and because registration (and therefore profits) can be cancelled.
No independent body is checking the quality of complementary and alternative medicines in South Africa.
The producers and sellers of complementary and alternative medicines in South Africa are certainly not voluntarily submitting information on the quality of their products to any independent body.
This means that none of the (unregistered) complementary or alternative medicines available on the shelves of your leading (and non-leading) pharmacies, health shops or supermarkets have been independently assessed in terms of their contents (what’s on the label is in the product), possible contaminants (bacterial or toxic heavy metals), spiked substances (e.g. Viagra), prohibited substances (e.g. dangerous herbal products) or scheduled substances(e.g. dehydroepiandrosterone — DHEA). [Sorry to disillusion you, Mike.]
If it is not known exactly what’s in every batch of a medicine/product, logically you can’t know whether it’s safe or effective. And if the original medicine/product has not initially been rigorously and independently assessed for quality (and safety and efficacy), self-monitoring has no validity or reliability.
So, please, should you be feeling a little short (fat, bald, small, libido-deficient, aged), don’t hesitate to buy my product(s). You and your healthcare professionals will be astounded at the results. I will make a fortune, and will have joined a cohort of unscrupulous, predatory, and soulless sellers of scam products in South Africa.
Disclaimer: Please note that any resemblance between “Taller-brand” and “HeightoMAX” , or any other globally available commercial height increase product, is purely coincidental.
This entry was posted
on Sunday, December 30th, 2007 at 6:04 pm and is filed under Media & Marketing, Lifestyle.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
17 Responses to “How to sell your soul in 10 easy steps”
Really fascinating piece. Interestingly enough, most of the vitamins etc found on the shelves do contain high levels of heavy metal contaminants, industrial chemicals, minute (if present at all) quantities of the actual vitamin..often the calcium is derived from chalk etc which can’t be absorbed by the body and simply passes out in the urine.
Even Fish Oil, Vit A etc is toxic due to the high levels of mercury present in most fish these days because of the dumped waste etc in oceans, which the EPA approved until late. Now, the waste is simply being co-opted as fertilizer, apparently the ocean is jam-packed with sludge that has broken down the food chain. An oyster from NY could kill a man. whee. what a world…organic food which doesn’t contain the deadly herbicides, pesticides etc are no longer free of GM modifications..
Hi Roy
You seem to have ignored the likes of the MCC approved drugs like VIOX and Celebrex. These drugs are sure to kill you. But do not worry,the have been approved by the MCC for safety and efficacy. Now talk about making money, these drugs have patents the prohibit any competition. The drug manufacturers set their own prices,so are set to make seroius money. You also forgot to mention that the MCC have the power to stop any natural medicine from being sold if it is a danger to the public, whether the product is registered or not.
You also forgot in mentioning that DHEA is scheduled here in South Africa, it is freely available OVER the counter in the USA. I have not heard of any person dying of DHEA.You seem to leave out of your artricle quite a few imortant facts. Every batch of alopathic medicines are not tested by the MCC for content so “If it is not known exactly what’s in every batch of a medicine/product, logically you can’t know whether it’s safe or effective” You see the same applies to registered Medicines. I can site many examples of where registered medicines do not contained labelled content, for exmple pharmaceutical giant Schering Plough was found to be selling ashtma inhalers without any medication in side them and fine $500 Million dollars.
There are always two sides to a story.
Best regards
Truth Hurts
Khadija Sharife responds: Really fascinating piece. Interestingly enough, most of the vitamins etc found on the shelves do contain high levels of heavy metal contaminants…………
Please post your evidence for this sweeping statement as I know of no evidence for this? This is nonsense.
Basic facts - the quality of water, the source of the agri product, the volume of pesticide, insecticide and herbicides used (all of which contain heavy metals, industrial chemicals etc) the sludge used as fertilizer which actually the bio-solid waste of manufacturies, the process of manufacturing the actual material, the fillers that are used, the quality control of the factory etc
These companies do not produce the products in the storeroom. There is no real regulation, certification or quality control of so-called alternative health products. My family and I have mercury poisoning and as such were requested to enhance our nutritional intake by supplements, alas, if the supplements are not organic, one is swallowing a myth that is potentially toxic.
This doesn’t exclude the reality that most products today are contaminated with such toxins, from milk to beef to vegetables. However, buying organic and fair trade reduces the bulk of the contaminants, the cleanest possible food to buy.
This debate will become totally irrational and degenerate into a Creationalist vs Atheist type mosh pit of head banging, gnashing of teeth and tears. It all simply boils down to paradigms of belief, cold science and scepticism. As a pharmacist, allopath and true believer - I should probably go no further. But as a certified total Irish loon, I stage dive right into such a “never to be resolved” discussion with gay abandon..
It is my humble opinion that Roy Jobson has written a well researched, balanced, scientifically correct and truthful article. These issues are eternally debated within medical circles and Roy is pretty much spot on. The panic mongers and conspiracy theorists of sludge in the seabed, GM crops and horror toxic drug are like most good chicken licken mystics, partially correct… but should not create enough panic for a stampede for the nearest planet….. But plenty to precipitate confusion, mis-information and anxiety .
Fact is; because there are watchdogs like the FDA and MRA/MCC (with some admitted glaringly venal faults), allopathic medicines are internationally constantly monitored and are recalled or taken off the market if found to be toxic or harmful. Panic mechanic “Truth Hurts” seems to have selective and slipping reality gears, as he rants in favour of his unregulated complementary paradigm, while lashing out at a sometimes over-regulated allopathic drug industry.
FYI: Vioxx is an COX-2 anti-inflammatory that was taken off the market worldwide 2 years ago. Celebrex continues to be a top selling COX2 AI. I’m not aware of any evidence of heavy metals in any reputable vitamins. DHEA is a steroid and schedule 5 - finish and klaar.
The allopathic pharmaceutical industry and Health Professions are heavily regulated by a myriad of Statutory Councils and Professional Associations. The complementary medical industry is almost completely unregulated and its “science” is, at best, based on anecdotal evidence and pseudo-science. The ASA (advertising standards association) has succeeded in reigning in many of the more outrageous adverts and claims, but the self regulatory HPASA Health Products association of SA has failed to develop any framework for regulating complementary and traditional medicines. When questioned the HPA passes the buck to the Dept of Health. Many complementary medicines have so little active ingredient that consumers may as well buy expensive water. Many others (especially traditional medicines) refuse to divulge their ingredients and manufacturers source herbs and mutis from dodgy suppliers. The trick and excuse used by many is “complementary medicines can do no harm”, while making extravagant claims for totally untested products using, as Roy points out, hocus pocus like being researched by double Nobel Laureate and Vit C junkie; Linus Pauling
I’m sure there will be many blogs on this issue and many will be more hysterical than “truth hurts” ……Ho-hum…. The mixture of a lively imagination combined with just a smidgen of knowledge, a couple of anecdotes and a dollop of web.2 info sharing and we have whole religions, belief systems and apocalyptic heresies being formed like black holes in intergalactic space
Johhnie call the chemist on December 31st, 2007 at 6:02 pm
It is supprising that we deny existance of poisons like in the ARV’s.Benzine was there and was denied.Others are still there till today.The DoH did some tests on these ‘perceived’ boosters and supplements and they found that the % mentioned on containers could not be substantiated by Laboratory tests.She spoke about it on TV.Some results of researches are available on-line.The water we drink is not as hygienic as we are made to believe.Laboratory results conducted show this.Streams are polluted and animals are fed food and water from the same ground full of pesticides and herbicides.Infants born nowadays have tendencies linked to the environmental exposures.
Khadija Sharife - Still no evidence sited for your sweeping statement, why not, can’t you find it.
Johhnie call the chemist or is it Johhnie come lately………..you like to weave fact and opinion together. You say Roys article was well researched and trutefull article. O really……..Roys makes his opinions seem fact but they are not. For example he says “Even though the call-up was for six months only”. This is nonsense.
Roy must read the wording of the call up. It is certainly not limited to 6 months as he suggests. (For those wanting to know it was No. 23128 of 22 Feb 2002. No. R204) This is the problem when lay people like you and Roy start fancying yourselves as lawyers.
By the way the contraceptive pill is also a steroid….finished and klaar. What is your point about DHEA? Just beacause its scheduled here in SA does not mean it should be. In the USA its not.
Hidden away at the end of the first paragraph of part (b) of the Complementary Medicines Call up [Gazette No23128, Government Notice R.204] of 22 February 2002 (date of publication), is the following:
“The Medicines Control Council . . . has determined that, with effect from the date of publication of this notice all preparations or mixtures of substances that fall under the definition of a medicine [description of these] shall be subject to a call-up process . . . and shall be submitted to the MCC within six (6) months of the date of publication this notice.”
The problem is that in the next paragraph there’s a statement that [the call-up] “shall relate also to medicines that become available after the said date” but without a specified cut-off date.
Perhaps “Truth Hurts” and I are both right about this? I certainly don’t fancy myself as a lawyer — but I do strongly believe that all legislation and its accompanying bits and pieces should be understandable to the lay person.
My understanding of the call up was that it was primarily for audit purposes so that the MCC could get a handle on what was happening in the complementary medicines market. It’s nearly 6 years down the line and we still have confusion and chaos. And only the sellers of the products have benefited. As I’ve already pointed out, consumers cannot even be sure that what’s said to be in a product, is actually in it.
In part (a) of the “call up” it states: “The data compiled from this call up will enable Council to compile an audit of all products currently available in the market place. Council will review the claims of safety, quality and efficacy for all identified products and will determine whether any such claims constitute a public, health hazard and act accordingly.”
This is where the whole system has seemingly fallen apart — in fact this “review” (re-labelled an “assessment” by the DoH spokesperson), if, as I have been led to believe, is simply entering products into a database, it is not adequate for determining safety, quality and efficacy and whether or not any of the claims made constitute a public health hazard. The only “natural” substance that has been declared undesirable by the MCC subsequent to this notice was Kava kava, and this based mainly on overseas experiences of deaths, liver toxicity, and the need for liver transplantation. It was not based on an assessment/review of products submitted as part of the “call up”. [See Government Notice No 25367, 29 August 2003.]
One of the major advantages of synthesised (as opposed to “natural”) medicines is that toxic heavy metals are excluded. One possibly toxic product I am aware of, frequently advertised on TV at one time, was a calcium product obtained from natural “coral”. The United States version (probably the one imported into SA) was found to be heavily contaminated with lead.
The list of products I submitted to the MCC earlier this year contained the banned substances “yohimbine” and “damiana”. According to the Health Products Association of SA (HPA) website, they have submitted a letter to the MCC urging it to reconsider “damiana” because they consider it “safe”. Why don’t the manufacturers represented by the HPA submit all their damiana-containing products for full registration with the MCC? All they would have to do is prove the quality and the efficacy (for all its different and various uses as claimed), if they already have evidence for the safety.
DHEA was removed from the USA market in 1985 because of false claims about health benefits. It reappeared with the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, but, support for the health claims, particularly as tested on people, is lacking. Given that DHEA products are sold as dietary supplements, there is no control over their contents or the manufacturing practices of the companies that make the supplements. One independent evaluation found that the amount of DHEA in over the counter products ranged from 0% to 150% of what the content stated on the label. Paraphrased from: http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/dehydroepiandrosterone-dhea-000299.htm
Far better that an attempt is made to control DHEA as a Scheduled drug than for it to masquerade as a “dietary supplement”. I do not know if “Truth Hurts” is a man or a woman, but if a man, may I recommend against taking the contraceptive pill. The contraceptive pill in South Africa is also a Scheduled medicine.
As for asthma inhalers being sold without active ingredient — the point is that they were discovered to be ineffective and the manufacturers were fined. In South Africa, it’s highly unlikely that anyone would even report an ineffective complementary medicine, and no fine would be imposed. We do not yet have a system whereby companies are fined for selling ineffective medicines, and are required to compensate the consumers who bought them.
Londoner — all medicines have side effects. With ARVs most side effects can be controlled, and must be weighed up against the “side effects” of AIDS itself. The Minister of Health’s unfortunate statement that ARVs are “poison” was particularly ill-advised without the rider that AIDS is even more poisonous in the long term. I know of no ARV containing benzine. The scam product “Virodene”, however, contained a toxic industrial solvent.
Johnnie call the chemist. Thanks. I do hope, if you’re a community pharmacist, that you’re not selling any of these scam products.
Hi Roy
We cannot be both right about the 6 month date. In this case I am right and you are wrong. The fact is the call up only specifies that the response for existing medicines albeit complimentary ones must be submitted within 6 months of the call up date. All others that come onto the market must nevertheless still be submitted. There is no cut off period as you seemed to suggest in your article. To suggest that the information is, as you say “hidden away in the fisrt paragraph” is plain nonsense. It is there for everyone to see. This choice of words on your part just exposes your bias against complimentary medicines.
Let me also clarify for you…… The call up was for registration purposes. The call up states that a submission shall “be considered a primary step in the registration process”. It is not an audit, although the information will enable the MCC to compile an audit. You must not read the call up to suit your argument but rather as it states in English. This will allow a proper debate on the issues.
Roy your major gripe seems to be that products do not meet label claims. The are existing laws in South Africa that can deal with this. It is a common law offence called FRAUD. If firms wish the defraud the public, the mere registration of a product as a medicine will not protect the public from this.
Your whole argument misses out one vital point and that is new invented molecules as opposed to those molecules found in nature and used for hundreds of years without regulation have very different safety profiles. To equate the two is disingeneous. The third leading cause of Death in the USA are adverse drug reactions. This is not incorrectly prescribed medicines but correctly prescribed medicines that cause an adverse drug reaction. As you well know any product registered as a medicine does not have long term safety data. That is why registration and control over these invented and patented molecules is necessary. Your only positive comment is they may not contain heavy metals. This is a joke considering how many people pharmaceutical drugs kill annually.Consider prescription medication: in April of 1998, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported that properly prescribed pharmaceutical medicines killed over 106 000 hospital patients in the preceding year due to toxic reactions.Incidents resulting in death from complementary medicines are extremely small: about 50 deaths from all causes over the past 10 years can be attributed to complementary medicines worldwide.Only two contaminations of a complementary medicine have occurred in the USA over the past 15 years. This is statistically insignificant when compared with food contamination, which kills thousands of people every year.
I agree that legislation and laws should be written in such a way as to allow lay people like yourselves to understand it, but this is not the debate here.
Arnica, Oh good old Arnica. What will life be without Arnica…
It’s such a pity that a huge double blind study on all the curative aspects of Arnica in 1998 found that it had none. The study covered such conditions as muscular pain, bruising, general aches and pains and so on. When the results on muscular pain were analysed, it was found that Arnica didn’t work nearly as well as the denatured oil and alcohol mix that was supposed to have no active ingredients.
I’ve always been concerned about Spirulina.
Spirulina is one of those ALTERNATIVE supplements that that regularly appears on the shelves with heavy metals. It is in the nature of Spirulina algae to absorb mercury and other heavy metals and because in South Africa, no testing takes place between harvesting and the consumer. Even the leading brand has recalled some products when an independent laboratory bought some and found concentrations of (I think it was) zinc.
I think the alternative health loonies miss just two points.
1 - Test the product using recognised scientific procedures that one’s peers can check up on. (many alternatives products like Spirulina pass this test)
2 – Continue to test each batch of the product for all the important criteria and keep the records for a reasonable period.
By the way, I still use Arnica but now I know that its amazing curative powers are all in my mind.
Methinks “Truth Hurts” is perhaps a snake oil salesman? If the truth hurts, why don’t the complementary medicine marketers submit their products for proper scientific testing? Because science hurts - it hurts profits.
Truth hurts seems to miss the point that I declared my interets as a pharmacist who knows his law and never that I am a lawyer -I leave that to Ant Brink and Ronnie Suresh Roberts.
The six month call up of complementary medicine -and its de facto open ended extention - whether you can justify in law or not - is still a fraud with a capital F.
Allopathic meds are required to submit around 15000 pages of A4 paper background for every new drug registered in SA - regardless of the fact that they are more than often already fully registered in USA and Europe.
The MCC then can take up to 5 years before registration is granted
Complementary medicine manufacturers use their 2 page application as “proof of registration” and flaunt this in pharmacies and health shops. They are then granted a nappi code which entitles members to claim from medical aid. NO proof of safety, toxicity or efficacy needs to be submitted and to the best of my knowledge: none of the estimated 60000 complementary meds submited under the call up have been registered by the MCC
No one knows how many are killed by complementary meds as there is no system of reporting such morbidity. There is even less scientific evidence regarding the sometimes extravagant claims of such products
Allopathic meds are closely scrutinised on a benefit vs risk and toxicity basis
Johnny come lately on January 9th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Truth Hurts: The limitations of the 1998 Lazarou article in JAMA are pointed out in the editorial of the same edition. If no one is actively monitoring complementary medicines for side effects, where do your statistics come from? Pan Pharmaceuticals in Australia had to recall a large number of products in 2003 because of quality issues. Apparently they were not adequately cleaning their machines between making different medicines. Some of their products were imported into SA — but no one knows if they were the affected ones or not.
By the way — do you, as suggested, have a vested interest in any of these kinds of products?
John: Whether or not your particular arnica product’s powers are in your mind or not, the point of my original piece was that no one would have independently checked whether the product even has any arnica in it.
Gavin: Indeed. The industry is estimated at about R7billion a year in SA, so the old excuse of not being able to afford to do adequate research is no longer valid.
Johnny come lately: You’ve summarised the issues very clearly, thank you.
[…] medicines. There has instead been an explosion of products onto the market — and, as previously pointed out, no one is independently checking even the quality of these products, let alone the claims made. If […]
All comments must be approved by our editors, click here to read the editorial guidelines for comments. Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.
profile
Roy Jobson is a medical doctor and 'educator of adults' who teaches pharmacology to pharmacy students at Rhodes University. He is a vicarious observer of South African society through his association with the Khulumani Support Group -- his wife is the director. Until recently, he participated in medicines regulation as a member of the MCC, particularly in the area of pharmacovigilance. He is at present registered for a PhD in the advertising and marketing of medicines in South Africa.
Simply Slim relaunched their new product, as spokesperson of the Department of Health (DOH) Fidel Hadebe stated on 15 April 2010, "in defiance of the ...
Advertisements proudly carrying the "Product of the Year 2010" logo are beginning to pop up with annoying frequency. I chanced on one such product whi...
With tens of thousands of unregistered complementary medicines on the market, it's interesting and surprising that the Medicines Control Council (MCC)...
Butana Almond Nofomela is about to be paroled after having served 21 years for the murder of Johannes Lourens, a Brits farmer. He had been sentenced t...
According to the meetings schedule published on the Medicines Control Council's (MCC) website, the council's next meeting is to be held on Friday, Apr...
Really fascinating piece. Interestingly enough, most of the vitamins etc found on the shelves do contain high levels of heavy metal contaminants, industrial chemicals, minute (if present at all) quantities of the actual vitamin..often the calcium is derived from chalk etc which can’t be absorbed by the body and simply passes out in the urine.
Even Fish Oil, Vit A etc is toxic due to the high levels of mercury present in most fish these days because of the dumped waste etc in oceans, which the EPA approved until late. Now, the waste is simply being co-opted as fertilizer, apparently the ocean is jam-packed with sludge that has broken down the food chain. An oyster from NY could kill a man. whee. what a world…organic food which doesn’t contain the deadly herbicides, pesticides etc are no longer free of GM modifications..
(Report abuse)