Beyond ‘band-aids’ for hunger

By Danielle Nierenberg and Brian Halweil

This year marks the 25th anniversary of the devastating famine that hit Ethiopia in the 1980s. At that time, Bob Geldof brought together a group of well-meaning musicians to raise money to feed millions of people. Band Aid raised millions of dollars and immeasurable awareness with the compelling chorus of “feed the world”, but global interest in those hungry people has plummeted in the last two decades, if the barometer is international investment in agriculture. Agriculture’s share of global development aid has dropped from 7% to 4% since the song debuted, even though most of the world’s poor and hungry people depend on agriculture for their livelihoods.

The famine-stricken Ethiopia that inspired Band Aid remains hobbled by food shortages. Some 23 million people in the Horn of Africa are at risk for starvation, according to the World Food Programme, which delivers food aid around the world. The global recession and recent spike in food prices isn’t helping, either. The United Nations reported recently that the number of hungry people worldwide has crested 1 billion. The sheer number of hungry people isn’t the only reason we must raise our standards for success.

Because agriculture makes up such a large percentage of the planet’s surface, and intimately touches our rivers, air and other natural resources, the world can’t tolerate some of the unintended — and counterproductive — consequences of how we farm and produce food. And farmers everywhere, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, need crop varieties and whole new approaches to farming that help them deal with drought, extreme heat and increasingly erratic weather.

Our collective understanding of how to “cure” hunger has matured enough to recognise that solutions lie not only in shipping food aid, but also in a new approach to agriculture that nourishes people and the planet.

There is no shortage of innovative ideas on the African continent.

We have four recommendations for farmers, agribusiness, politicians and other agricultural decision-makers:

Move beyond seeds

The vast majority of global investment in agriculture is aimed at seeds. But we’ve neglected the environment in which the seeds grow: the soil, trees, livestock, the farm and the food processors, roads and other pieces of the food system that gets the crop to market and onto tables.

In sub-Saharan Africa, the region of the world where the greatest percentage of people are hungry, just 4% of the farmland is irrigated (in Asia, 70% of farmland is irrigated). In parts of Kenya, Tanzania and Mali, the hundreds of thousands of farmers using inexpensive, locally made water pumps have seen incomes double and triple because they can grow a greater range of crops over a greater share of the year and are protected from losing entire crops to drought.

Cut the slack in the system

Instead of focusing on increasing production, make better use of what we already produce. It turns out that a shocking 30% to 50% of the harvest in poorer nations spoils or is contaminated by pests or mould before it reaches the dinner table.

Simple fixes can go a long way. In Nairobi, Margaret Njeri Ndimu has started selling goat milk in plastic bags sealed with candle wax. She learned this simple process through a training programme provided by the Mazingira Institute; the bags make it easier to manage and sell her milk, allowing her customers to purchase small quantities of the perishable milk in portable containers. Similar practices can be used by other urban milk producers in cities all over the world.

Go local (and regional)

Just as important as the techniques that farmers use is to what extent the farmers and farm communities control the techniques. Locavores in the US and Europe argue the benefits of a decentralised food system. Solutions for hunger are rooted in harnessing local crop diversity, building up locally owned infrastructure and developing regional markets.

In Kampala, Uganda, Project Disc is working with Slow Food chapters to catalogue and revive neglected indigenous foods and foodways that can help inject diversity into diets and farmers’ fields. At the World Vegetable Centre in Tanzania, researchers are working with farmers to breed vegetable varieties that don’t need fertilisers and pesticides, use less water, are locally appropriate and raise farmer income. Babel Isack, a Tanzanian tomato farmer, advises staff at the centre about tomato varieties that best suit his needs, including those that depend less on chemical sprays and have a longer shelf life.

Position farms on the front line of climate change

Agriculture is the human endeavour that will be most affected by climate change. But agriculture, livestock grazing and forestry — responsible for nearly one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions — is the only near-term option for large-scale greenhouse sequestration. A combination of farming with perennial crops and grasses, cutting nitrogen fertiliser use and managing manure better, reducing erosion and enriching soils with organic matter could offset one-quarter of global greenhouse gas emissions.

According to Dr Frank Place of the World Agroforestry Centre in Kenya, several million farmers in sub-Saharan Africa are using leguminous trees and shrubs that are grown along with or before or after crops. This technique can improve soil, double or triple the yields of the subsequent crop and eliminate the need for artificial fertilisers.

All of these measures hold untapped potential for boosting global food production, strengthening rural communities, rebuilding ecosystems and reducing poverty and hunger. And in contrast to “band-aid” shipments of food, the lasting solutions will involve farmers and food communities working together to feed themselves.

Danielle Nierenberg and Brian Halweil are senior researchers at the Worldwatch Institute. Danielle has been travelling in sub-Saharan Africa for the last two months researching innovations in African agriculture.

8 Responses to “Beyond ‘band-aids’ for hunger”

  1. Michael #

    Great article!

    February 25, 2010 at 5:44 pm
  2. La Quebecoise #

    Well another consideration to be put on the list: is that in Ethiopia where I spent from 1984-1987, is that the perishing population of 1984,which was succored by the international community who later poured billions into the country is once again at risk;. ONLY THIS TIME THE POPULATION OF ETHIOPIA HAS DOUBLED!!!!!!!!!, Not the school, not the knowledge, not the treadle pumps to irrigate,not the roads…the population.

    February 25, 2010 at 6:33 pm
  3. judith@softwareafrica.co.za #

    What a refreshing article – thanks for the information! May I publish parts on my EarthLife Africa Facebook group acknowledging the source?

    February 25, 2010 at 10:11 pm
  4. Clean Air #

    Excellent article.

    February 26, 2010 at 8:46 am
  5. MLH #

    Really good article. Now please send it to the WB, the AfDB and government agricultural depts throughout Africa. These are organisations you can actually influence.
    Me? Sure, I have tomatoes, paw-paws and bananas coming up all over my garden, from the natural compost I insist on. But they are not enough to feed the world…

    February 26, 2010 at 11:25 am
  6. Hugh Robinson #

    No matter what gets ploughed into most of Africa the end result remains the same.

    In two months Danielle should have discovered that using the age old methods, Africa will only produce what is required and never meet its agricultural needs. The mindset of effort equals profit / reward rarely fits the African ideal. For almost all of Africa it is always someone elses problem to solve never their responsibility to get it right.

    Take SA up to few years back we produced all of our food needs, now we import. Not long and we shall be a basket case.

    It took Zim just five short years to get beyond food recovery.

    Africa always has an excuse for some shortcoming and that is the way it always will be.

    February 26, 2010 at 1:22 pm
  7. halfhalf #

    Thanks for the article. Mail and Guardian has far to few articles on agriculture and related matters. Food matters are of greater importance than totally obsolete car reviews, lifestyle hints which none but journalists on a freebie can afford, gay movie reviews or nauseating malemamannewales.
    When your staffers do allow publication on agriculture and related matters it makes for well researched, structured and balanced reading. Farmers in South Africa esp. have a wealth of knowledge and experience and are willing to pass this on to neighbours and generations to come. They are the backbone of the nation, earning a livelyhood by the sweat of their brow in demeaning, hard work with never a holiday but sunday, contrary to the plunderers of earths resources who hide in the anonymity of shareholding, speculation and profit.
    Taking into account how much the latter dominate the economics pages, it makes me wonder that we are still eating something as antiquated as food and not money and ideology in the hip restaurants.

    February 28, 2010 at 12:38 pm
  8. Thank you for the terrific comments, will reach back to several of you individually. I am blogging everyday about projects I visit in Africa at: http://blogs.worldwatch.org/nourishingtheplanet/

    All the best, Dani

    March 3, 2010 at 7:31 pm

Leave a Reply

 characters available