<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s put our breasts together for &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:41:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy-Mari Cloete</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-77060</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy-Mari Cloete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-77060</guid>
		<description>You offer too many caveats. Just say what you want to say. South Africa needs a big wake up. Too many of us see things as &#039;fun&#039;, and fail to see how misogynist they are. And too few of us take women seriously. But if a man were to write about sexism, he would probably get more kudos, and his opinion would count more than yours or mine. Let&#039;s get angry about it and let&#039;s do something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You offer too many caveats. Just say what you want to say. South Africa needs a big wake up. Too many of us see things as &#8216;fun&#8217;, and fail to see how misogynist they are. And too few of us take women seriously. But if a man were to write about sexism, he would probably get more kudos, and his opinion would count more than yours or mine. Let&#8217;s get angry about it and let&#8217;s do something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-38361</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-38361</guid>
		<description>I in a way resent the comment: &quot;In fact, I don’t believe that anyone can be a woman and not be a feminist.&quot;

Feminism is a an explosive reaction to sexism.  It goes from one extreme to the other - and I don&#039;t care who you are that&#039;s ALWAYS bad.  It doesn&#039;t help anything and in fact adds to the problem.  It&#039;s something I&#039;ve learned from extensively studying graphology, extremes are never a good thing, and so it goes in life.  I don&#039;t want to be crude, but I think it makes my point, being a bitch won&#039;t change a guy from being a dick, and in fact will likely encourage his behavior.

If you don&#039;t like National Cleavage Day, a tit for tat Package Packaged Day isn&#039;t going to change anything.  Just say, I don&#039;t agree with it, make a persuasive argument, and rally other women to support you.  If you get enough women who aren&#039;t showing off their cleavage on that day then it will fade away.  Those that do are more than likely doing it in a jovial fashion or they can only find value in the lustful glances of men so just pity them.

Or change the day.  Say instead of &quot;objectifying&quot; myself, we&#039;ll do &quot;Women Strength Day&quot; or something to that effect, highlight women of power or merit, but don&#039;t do it in a way that&#039;s seen as, &quot;this is only to get back at you&quot; because it loses its effect.  Women who invoke not only femininity (which by no means is the same as feminism) but possess leadership qualities and can be truly held as icons.

I want to tell you some of the reactions though so you won&#039;t be surprised by it, those guys who are going to make fun of you for being feminists are still going to make fun of you for having said icons.  That&#039;s their nature and nothing really that you&#039;re going to say is going to change that.  Getting pissed off at their behavior in a sense validates what they&#039;re doing in the first place - they do it to get a rise out of you, so when they don&#039;t get the reaction they want, they have to learn to be more creative.  In my experience, many of them get bored and just give up.  You&#039;re a woman, you&#039;re grace, you&#039;re intelligent, you&#039;re half of what makes humanity great, and don&#039;t let anybody&#039;s comments take that away from you.  Don&#039;t give them that power.

Live strength, don&#039;t just complain about it, and your example will speak far louder than your words.

Case in point: I had a male coworker - in a teasing sense, he wasn&#039;t serious - tell me that women can&#039;t play the same games as men because we&#039;re not as good at it.  Had I gotten upset and got into a battle of wills in a tit for tat he would have known that in order to get me upset, that&#039;s all he would have to do, and bring it up again.  Instead I just shrugged and didn&#039;t say anything.  He pressed a bit harder for a little bit and kept at it for a couple of days, but he finally stopped because it wasn&#039;t getting him what he wanted and he hasn&#039;t mentioned a word about it since.

Being a man and a woman isn&#039;t about equality, it&#039;s about balance.  We compliment each other.  There are ways around those jerks in our lives, but don&#039;t exacerbate the issue by being a part of the problem.

*And I&#039;m off my soap box, you all have a great day, and remember strength and beauty go hand in hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I in a way resent the comment: &#8220;In fact, I don’t believe that anyone can be a woman and not be a feminist.&#8221;</p>
<p>Feminism is a an explosive reaction to sexism.  It goes from one extreme to the other &#8211; and I don&#8217;t care who you are that&#8217;s ALWAYS bad.  It doesn&#8217;t help anything and in fact adds to the problem.  It&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve learned from extensively studying graphology, extremes are never a good thing, and so it goes in life.  I don&#8217;t want to be crude, but I think it makes my point, being a bitch won&#8217;t change a guy from being a dick, and in fact will likely encourage his behavior.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like National Cleavage Day, a tit for tat Package Packaged Day isn&#8217;t going to change anything.  Just say, I don&#8217;t agree with it, make a persuasive argument, and rally other women to support you.  If you get enough women who aren&#8217;t showing off their cleavage on that day then it will fade away.  Those that do are more than likely doing it in a jovial fashion or they can only find value in the lustful glances of men so just pity them.</p>
<p>Or change the day.  Say instead of &#8220;objectifying&#8221; myself, we&#8217;ll do &#8220;Women Strength Day&#8221; or something to that effect, highlight women of power or merit, but don&#8217;t do it in a way that&#8217;s seen as, &#8220;this is only to get back at you&#8221; because it loses its effect.  Women who invoke not only femininity (which by no means is the same as feminism) but possess leadership qualities and can be truly held as icons.</p>
<p>I want to tell you some of the reactions though so you won&#8217;t be surprised by it, those guys who are going to make fun of you for being feminists are still going to make fun of you for having said icons.  That&#8217;s their nature and nothing really that you&#8217;re going to say is going to change that.  Getting pissed off at their behavior in a sense validates what they&#8217;re doing in the first place &#8211; they do it to get a rise out of you, so when they don&#8217;t get the reaction they want, they have to learn to be more creative.  In my experience, many of them get bored and just give up.  You&#8217;re a woman, you&#8217;re grace, you&#8217;re intelligent, you&#8217;re half of what makes humanity great, and don&#8217;t let anybody&#8217;s comments take that away from you.  Don&#8217;t give them that power.</p>
<p>Live strength, don&#8217;t just complain about it, and your example will speak far louder than your words.</p>
<p>Case in point: I had a male coworker &#8211; in a teasing sense, he wasn&#8217;t serious &#8211; tell me that women can&#8217;t play the same games as men because we&#8217;re not as good at it.  Had I gotten upset and got into a battle of wills in a tit for tat he would have known that in order to get me upset, that&#8217;s all he would have to do, and bring it up again.  Instead I just shrugged and didn&#8217;t say anything.  He pressed a bit harder for a little bit and kept at it for a couple of days, but he finally stopped because it wasn&#8217;t getting him what he wanted and he hasn&#8217;t mentioned a word about it since.</p>
<p>Being a man and a woman isn&#8217;t about equality, it&#8217;s about balance.  We compliment each other.  There are ways around those jerks in our lives, but don&#8217;t exacerbate the issue by being a part of the problem.</p>
<p>*And I&#8217;m off my soap box, you all have a great day, and remember strength and beauty go hand in hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caryl</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-26026</link>
		<dc:creator>Caryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-26026</guid>
		<description>These arguments and counter-arguments have been both instructive and amusing. However, let&#039;s not lose sight of the important issues:
a) sexism is viewed as less of a social crime than racism;
b) personalities calling someone a k***** (ooops!)received more outraged talk-time and colummn inches and analysis than the taxi rape
c) South Africa is an extremely dangerous place to be female because of prevailing attitudes (from both men and women) that women are undeserving of being protected and cherished. 

We still are the weaker sex, no matter that we have the vote and some measure of economic power. We are the ones afraid to walk alone anywhere, anytime, wearing what we choose because in the back of our minds is the insidious thought that we are vulnerable to attack simply because we are more fragile. 

One gun, one knife, one broken bottle, one finger wielded by someone determined to put us in our place has the power to take away all our hard-won personal gains. We are reduced to being objects to gratify someone else&#039;s desires. We are non-human in the eyes of others if all they see is an opprtunity for gratification, or a threat to the perceived order of things (ie men on top).

Nowadays, it is not so much &quot;I am woman; hear me roar&quot; as it is &quot;I am woman; and I will hide away so as not to be violated.&quot;

It&#039;s a sad, shameful state to be in. Without full protection and acknowledgement by all society of women&#039;s fundamental rights to be who we want to be and wear what we want to wear, we cannot be said to be free - no matter what our Constitution may say about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These arguments and counter-arguments have been both instructive and amusing. However, let&#8217;s not lose sight of the important issues:<br />
a) sexism is viewed as less of a social crime than racism;<br />
b) personalities calling someone a k***** (ooops!)received more outraged talk-time and colummn inches and analysis than the taxi rape<br />
c) South Africa is an extremely dangerous place to be female because of prevailing attitudes (from both men and women) that women are undeserving of being protected and cherished. </p>
<p>We still are the weaker sex, no matter that we have the vote and some measure of economic power. We are the ones afraid to walk alone anywhere, anytime, wearing what we choose because in the back of our minds is the insidious thought that we are vulnerable to attack simply because we are more fragile. </p>
<p>One gun, one knife, one broken bottle, one finger wielded by someone determined to put us in our place has the power to take away all our hard-won personal gains. We are reduced to being objects to gratify someone else&#8217;s desires. We are non-human in the eyes of others if all they see is an opprtunity for gratification, or a threat to the perceived order of things (ie men on top).</p>
<p>Nowadays, it is not so much &#8220;I am woman; hear me roar&#8221; as it is &#8220;I am woman; and I will hide away so as not to be violated.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad, shameful state to be in. Without full protection and acknowledgement by all society of women&#8217;s fundamental rights to be who we want to be and wear what we want to wear, we cannot be said to be free &#8211; no matter what our Constitution may say about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-25959</link>
		<dc:creator>James Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-25959</guid>
		<description>I have old fashioned views on woman.

They should be offorded the utmost respect from every male, including the standing up when they enter a room, opening doors etc etc.
Those values shouldnt disappear just because they want to compete on at least an equal footing with men

We can still respect and adore them as our equals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have old fashioned views on woman.</p>
<p>They should be offorded the utmost respect from every male, including the standing up when they enter a room, opening doors etc etc.<br />
Those values shouldnt disappear just because they want to compete on at least an equal footing with men</p>
<p>We can still respect and adore them as our equals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odette</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-25951</link>
		<dc:creator>Odette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-25951</guid>
		<description>@ Dave

Your feminist friend needs a few pointers about manners. :-)

I believe that feminism is not a concept cast in stone. It is open to interpretation. If I can use your opening doors situation as an example. Not only do I appreciate when someone (man or woman) holds a door open for me, I do the same for others (men and women). As far as I am concerned it is about good manners and has nothing to do with being a man or a woman. Other feminists will disagree, as is their right.

As for your example about the women leching on rugby players. I have listened to men go on about beautiful women and it doesn&#039;t bother me. Just as it doesn&#039;t bother me that women do that about men. The issue under discussion is not about either sex admiring the other&#039;s physical attributes. Rather, it is about defining women purely on their physical attributes and objectifying them in a disrespectful manner.

NCD is used merely as an example and has sparked lively and interesting debate. 

The women who commented here are not strident humourless creatures who don&#039;t want to see any man admire a beautiful woman. What we want is some moderation, reasonableness and respect, all commodities which are sadly in short supply these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dave</p>
<p>Your feminist friend needs a few pointers about manners. <img src='http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I believe that feminism is not a concept cast in stone. It is open to interpretation. If I can use your opening doors situation as an example. Not only do I appreciate when someone (man or woman) holds a door open for me, I do the same for others (men and women). As far as I am concerned it is about good manners and has nothing to do with being a man or a woman. Other feminists will disagree, as is their right.</p>
<p>As for your example about the women leching on rugby players. I have listened to men go on about beautiful women and it doesn&#8217;t bother me. Just as it doesn&#8217;t bother me that women do that about men. The issue under discussion is not about either sex admiring the other&#8217;s physical attributes. Rather, it is about defining women purely on their physical attributes and objectifying them in a disrespectful manner.</p>
<p>NCD is used merely as an example and has sparked lively and interesting debate. </p>
<p>The women who commented here are not strident humourless creatures who don&#8217;t want to see any man admire a beautiful woman. What we want is some moderation, reasonableness and respect, all commodities which are sadly in short supply these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enough</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-25947</link>
		<dc:creator>Enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-25947</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t usually critise people in a topical forum such as this, but Lord Foom, Dave, you have gone too far. 

Notwithstanding the fact that this cleavage day thing was used merely as an illustrative example, and not the actual thing being criticised (which was sexism in general)the two of you were far too eager to pounce on the supposed triviality of the post. For supposed self-profests &quot;feminists&quot; you seem awfully keen to undermine the cause. 

You two aside, there are many women here who felt  a degree of discomfort with, if not the day itself, at least the concept it promoted. Perhaps the fact that this particular post got a lot of attention had less to do with cleavage day and more to do with the fact that the issue of sexism is so seldom raised in this forum.  

So how dare you - men - come in here and tell these women that their experiences are unimportant and that their concerns are trivial!  How dare you dictate what YOU believe feminism should be about, not once, but repeatedly? 
How DARE you?! 
Where do you get off undervaluing an experience that you have never personally encountered and can at very best sympathise with?

I&#039;ll take James Tobias up there over you two anyday.  At least we know what we&#039;re getting with him and don&#039;t have to worry about being ambushed by wolf in sheeps&#039; clothing. 

Quite frankly you can take your high-handed, condescending, I-know-what&#039;s-best-for-you, &quot;feminism&quot; and bugger off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t usually critise people in a topical forum such as this, but Lord Foom, Dave, you have gone too far. </p>
<p>Notwithstanding the fact that this cleavage day thing was used merely as an illustrative example, and not the actual thing being criticised (which was sexism in general)the two of you were far too eager to pounce on the supposed triviality of the post. For supposed self-profests &#8220;feminists&#8221; you seem awfully keen to undermine the cause. </p>
<p>You two aside, there are many women here who felt  a degree of discomfort with, if not the day itself, at least the concept it promoted. Perhaps the fact that this particular post got a lot of attention had less to do with cleavage day and more to do with the fact that the issue of sexism is so seldom raised in this forum.  </p>
<p>So how dare you &#8211; men &#8211; come in here and tell these women that their experiences are unimportant and that their concerns are trivial!  How dare you dictate what YOU believe feminism should be about, not once, but repeatedly?<br />
How DARE you?!<br />
Where do you get off undervaluing an experience that you have never personally encountered and can at very best sympathise with?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take James Tobias up there over you two anyday.  At least we know what we&#8217;re getting with him and don&#8217;t have to worry about being ambushed by wolf in sheeps&#8217; clothing. </p>
<p>Quite frankly you can take your high-handed, condescending, I-know-what&#8217;s-best-for-you, &#8220;feminism&#8221; and bugger off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-25908</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-25908</guid>
		<description>Odette -I work in the US with a feminist who is a cult figure with with about 50 000 americans. She was the one who chewed me out as a sexist for holding a door for her. We get on very well in general. I agree that shouldn&#039;t be an issue in feminism (and really, it is) but this sort of hypersensitivity and readiness to percieve sexual bias in anything is a problem. I&#039;ve sat quietly while picking up my kids - and listened to several young women letching about rugby players. They weren&#039;t valuing them for their minds. I was amused, not offended. It was normal hetrosexual lechery. Now invert that scene. They&#039;d have been Chauvinist sexist pigs, right? There is a danger of objectivising the other sex, agreed. However, when the two are in close balance there is a danger too of hypersensitivity, and assuming everything is sexist, eventually - as has happened in the US - skewing the balance. That&#039;s not a good thing either. Of course I can&#039;t and won&#039;t tell you what to get your knickers in a twist about. But feminists having a loud pile-on here (and deafening silence elsewhere)- does make it look like picking on soft targets is more attractive.
The Ayn Rand part (forget who it was now) left me in helpless laughter. Thank you. What an example to choose!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odette -I work in the US with a feminist who is a cult figure with with about 50 000 americans. She was the one who chewed me out as a sexist for holding a door for her. We get on very well in general. I agree that shouldn&#8217;t be an issue in feminism (and really, it is) but this sort of hypersensitivity and readiness to percieve sexual bias in anything is a problem. I&#8217;ve sat quietly while picking up my kids &#8211; and listened to several young women letching about rugby players. They weren&#8217;t valuing them for their minds. I was amused, not offended. It was normal hetrosexual lechery. Now invert that scene. They&#8217;d have been Chauvinist sexist pigs, right? There is a danger of objectivising the other sex, agreed. However, when the two are in close balance there is a danger too of hypersensitivity, and assuming everything is sexist, eventually &#8211; as has happened in the US &#8211; skewing the balance. That&#8217;s not a good thing either. Of course I can&#8217;t and won&#8217;t tell you what to get your knickers in a twist about. But feminists having a loud pile-on here (and deafening silence elsewhere)- does make it look like picking on soft targets is more attractive.<br />
The Ayn Rand part (forget who it was now) left me in helpless laughter. Thank you. What an example to choose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-25906</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-25906</guid>
		<description>Claire -a jackal is a predator that only that only picks on very small, near dead or the kills of larger predators. That seems quite an accurate description of your picking on trivia and avoiding real issues. I probably do need therapy - for PTS rather than whatever else. However you have missed the point of what I was saying too. Trends in SA are between 20-30 years behind the first world. The brouhaha you&#039;re making now was very typical in the US and Europe in the &#039;80&#039;s - the end result -where men are demonised, demoralised and the system is now skewed against them has been not particularly desirable for society. I am an odd fellow in that I am beating the game, over there. I&#039;m outnumbered by women, 5:1 and oddly a few of them have been trying to help me along - because I am a male in their bastion, and they don&#039;t see this situation as any more healthy than I see males dominating on the basis of sex. I don&#039;t think I need it. I reckon I&#039;ll prove myself, thank you. Not because of my sex! And yes, women are ascendent - particularly in professional writing. They&#039;re not there by ability (some are) but because the pre-1910 is being created in reverse. Do you think that desirable? Now, by all means go and wear a mini-skirt and uncovered head and face in Riiyad and drive a car and meet strangers. That freedom should be any humans. That&#039;s a task worth of feminism&#039;s attention. Unfortunately that&#039;s not one feminists are prepared to confront. Bizarrely that one seems left to conservative males.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claire -a jackal is a predator that only that only picks on very small, near dead or the kills of larger predators. That seems quite an accurate description of your picking on trivia and avoiding real issues. I probably do need therapy &#8211; for PTS rather than whatever else. However you have missed the point of what I was saying too. Trends in SA are between 20-30 years behind the first world. The brouhaha you&#8217;re making now was very typical in the US and Europe in the &#8217;80&#8242;s &#8211; the end result -where men are demonised, demoralised and the system is now skewed against them has been not particularly desirable for society. I am an odd fellow in that I am beating the game, over there. I&#8217;m outnumbered by women, 5:1 and oddly a few of them have been trying to help me along &#8211; because I am a male in their bastion, and they don&#8217;t see this situation as any more healthy than I see males dominating on the basis of sex. I don&#8217;t think I need it. I reckon I&#8217;ll prove myself, thank you. Not because of my sex! And yes, women are ascendent &#8211; particularly in professional writing. They&#8217;re not there by ability (some are) but because the pre-1910 is being created in reverse. Do you think that desirable? Now, by all means go and wear a mini-skirt and uncovered head and face in Riiyad and drive a car and meet strangers. That freedom should be any humans. That&#8217;s a task worth of feminism&#8217;s attention. Unfortunately that&#8217;s not one feminists are prepared to confront. Bizarrely that one seems left to conservative males.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-25899</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-25899</guid>
		<description>Wry smile. If Claire had said &#039;gee this is dumb&#039; and laughed at it, I&#039;d nodded, smiled and moved on. There are idiots who&#039;d support anything. The point is by giving it serious attention while ignoring real issues it trivialises feminism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wry smile. If Claire had said &#8216;gee this is dumb&#8217; and laughed at it, I&#8217;d nodded, smiled and moved on. There are idiots who&#8217;d support anything. The point is by giving it serious attention while ignoring real issues it trivialises feminism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWP</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/comment-page-2/#comment-25653</link>
		<dc:creator>SWP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/readerblog/2008/04/08/lets-put-our-breasts-together-for/#comment-25653</guid>
		<description>Dave, check out Scarface&#039;s comment, this is exactly why it is important for you to support women in this regard, because so many men actually do think like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, check out Scarface&#8217;s comment, this is exactly why it is important for you to support women in this regard, because so many men actually do think like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

