Levi Kabwato
Levi Kabwato

Zimbabwe, it’s complicated

This month marks two key milestones in Zimbabwe, a country that for over one and a half decades has attracted significant attention to itself because of an ailing economy, limitations on civil liberties and political rights and what has been described as the ”mass exodus” of its people to other countries the world over.

One, the so-called government of national unity (GNU) — a marriage of inconvenience in reality — turns four. It has been a rather long and tiring road for the political parties involved. But it is the people of Zimbabwe, arguably, who have endured surge after surge of national anxiety as solutions to the multifaceted crisis tormenting their country cannot be found.

Two, President Robert Mugabe turns 89. As usual, pomp and fanfare will accompany the birthday celebrations and, quite predictably. Mugabe will reaffirm his preparedness to represent his Zanu-PF party in the next elections — whenever they are held — and there will also be the usual tirade against real and imagined imperial forces — “Zimbabwe will never be a colony again!”

To better understand the GNU, a product largely associated with former South African president Thabo Mbeki, one has to constantly refer to what is called the global political agreement (GPA), the principal document signed by Zanu-PF and the two Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) factions. The agreement, it was hoped, would shape a roadmap towards solving the political impasse plaguing Zimbabwe in the aftermath of a violent and disputed poll.

If the GNU was a Facebook status, it would simply read: “It’s complicated.”

As I have written elsewhere, the GNU handed Zanu-PF a glorious opportunity to regroup and reassert its power and authority while at the same time ensuring that a threatening national implosion which, in 2008, could have seen Zimbabwean rise up against their government, was averted.

As part of the roadmap, Mugabe, Morgan Tsvangirai and Professor Arthur Mutambara committed to supporting a constitution-making exercise in an effort to replace the current Lancaster House Constitution, which has been amended at least 19 times. The idea was to give Zimbabwe a genuinely people-driven constitution unlike the Lancaster House one, which was negotiated and agreed upon on the eve of the country’s independence.

The Constitution Parliamentary Committee that was set up, as per GPA provisions, to administer and oversee the writing of a new constitution got an endorsement, recently, from the House on the draft it finally tabled. The word ”finally” is to be used with extreme caution here because chances exist that some amendments may still be made. Indeed, the ”final draft” that went to parliament was a ”second final draft” after the first one had to be amended.

The entire constitution-making exercise process itself has been unashamedly elitist and as all the GNU parties admit, it is a compromise document, much like the Lancaster House Constitution. Yet, Zimbabweans are expected to vote, in a referendum, and either support or reject such a draft.

To be fair, it is a constitution that has many good things that will appeal to many Zimbabweans. It also has some things that will be contested by many. The people of Zimbabwe, too, are expected to compromise and — “for the sake of progress” — endorse the charter.

As the GNU’s end looms, Zimbabweans have to take responsibility for the way things end and stop expecting earth-shattering interventions from SADC, the African Union or indeed, solidarity networks that exist globally. This responsibility should start with accepting a fact they have known throughout the ”years of the locust” and as captured brilliantly by French poet Charles Peguy: “Tyranny is always better organised than freedom.”

For stocktaking purposes, therefore, a line from Okot p’Bitek’s poem Song of Ocol may be profoundly useful:

What did you reap when uhuru ripened

and was harvested?

Media reports from Zimbabwe say cabinet ministers and lawmakers are demanding a ”harvest” of houses in leafy suburbs, vehicles and cash, among other benefits as their term comes to an end this June. It is nothing short of scandal that they have the temerity to make these demands days after the finance minister, Tendai Biti, said the country only had $217 in its bank account.

Someone should have whispered the words of Thomas Sankara to the GNU comrades: “If we always keep in mind that the interests of the masses take precedence over personal interests, then we will avoid going off course.”

What is even more scandalous, perhaps, is the reaction of Zimbabweans themselves. Beyond the predictable Facebook, Twitter and blog updates, it would appear as if there has not been much shock and anger expressed at the cabinet ministers’ and lawmakers’ outrageous demands for an ”exit package”. Has the country been that de-mobilised?

Yes, actually.

You just have to look at the divisions within the so-called pro-democracy movements — party bickering and splits, lack of coherent ideology, lack of vision and action, lack of contact with the grassroots and so on — to appreciate the depth of problem. And of course, such division helps no one except to assist Zanu-PF in entrenching its hegemony.

Zimbabwe has to be allowed to get the leaders it deserves.

But an honest question still needs to be asked: Is it ever possible to confront a dictatorship using democratic means? If it is possible then quite evidently, GNUs are not the way to go. Elections, maybe? Well, not the ones that is likely to be held this year. A Tsvangirai poll victory — the long-touted preference of many — could be more about Zimbabweans rejecting the 89-year-old Mugabe than actually endorsing him as a candidate. And, a Zanu-PF victory could be a result of a divide opposition vote.

The biggest losers, inevitably, will remain the ordinary people of Zimbabwe, betrayed by self-serving politicians and what appears to be a great deal of inactive citizenship.

How do you solve a problem like this one?

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • Testing the constitutionality of the powers and privileges committee
  • Frolicking failed the Mbete no-confidence motion
  • Lindiwe Sisulu and the myth of ‘welfare queens’
  • The receding spectre of a one-party state
  • 7 Responses to “Zimbabwe, it’s complicated”

    1. hilbert #

      Havn’t heard of a dictator stepping down without force, either that or the tyrant dies and his leading henchmen tear each other’s throats out to replace him, there are two outcomes then, either there is a last man standing and he takes over being dictator, or they wipe each other out completely and democracy gets a way in. btw zimbabweans forget that the vote was tainted by violence and the threat of genocide from zanu military if bob lost, and bob did actually lose the vote, only the votes of millions of dead zimbabweans helped him to actually have anybody vote for him. it’s brutal and brainless, not complicated. Mbeki used maximum force just to keep Zanu from killing the MDC and to try and get at least a toe into government for the actual winners of the election.

      February 13, 2013 at 4:54 pm
    2. michael #

      Levi, why are you so optimistic, it is going to get worse but at least they have economic freedom.

      February 13, 2013 at 5:13 pm
    3. Jeremiah #

      One of the best insights so far. ‘Is it ever possible to confront a dictatorship using democratic means? If it is possible then quite evidently, GNUs are not the way to go. ‘ This is not only true in Zimbabwe, but in Kenya, the DRC and other countries. Zimbabweans and other Africans deserve better than solutions imposed by leader cliques in the interest of regional solidarity. Great insight.

      February 13, 2013 at 5:59 pm
    4. The Creator #

      Well, at least Zimbabwe isn’t going to implode or suffer civil war.

      Their problems sound a lot like ours. Maybe we should devote some attention to solving our own — instead of constantly trying to figure out ways of making our situation worse.

      February 14, 2013 at 8:59 am
    5. Levi Kabwato

      @Hillbert – how can the vote of the people, then, be protected and respected? What mechanism needs to be in place? I agree on the violence – and there was a lot of it – but could it be possible that the MDC itself orchestrated some of that violence?

      @Michael – Economic freedom without their own currency? I think not.

      @Jeremiah – People have to take more responsibility and not allow leaders to get away with some of these arrangements.

      @The Creator – Yes, good that nor war will happen. But how can we make the most of people-to-people solidarity in order stop “making the our situation worse”?

      February 14, 2013 at 2:47 pm
    6. lafon #

      Greed knows no ideology. Sometimes, one lines his/her pockets with the blessing of the international community or -like with Mugabe – one takes advantage of nationalist and anti-colonialist discourse. The difference is, once ideological dust has settled, superficial. With such leaders the continent is doomed. And it seems the trend has spread the world over. Leaders of integrity are in very short supply. Everywhere money is the value. Can we still be saved?

      February 14, 2013 at 3:15 pm
    7. Jack Sparrow #

      I doubt whether this comment will make it as TL mods seem to be on a blitz of censorship but anyway and keeping it short to avoid wasting my time.

      An interesting and balanced Thought. Maybe the homily that should be interrogated is “people get the government they deserve”?

      February 16, 2013 at 5:25 am

    Leave a Reply

     characters available