« Blog Home
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

In his article, ‘The Rise of the Rest’, an excerpt from his book A Post-American World, the luminous editor of Newsweek magazine, Fareed Zakaria writes, “In 2006 and 2007, 124 countries grew their economies at over 4% a year. That includes more than 30 countries in Africa.”

He goes on to say, “A team of scholars at the University of Maryland has been tracking deaths caused by organized violence. Their data show that wars of all kinds have been declining since the mid-1980s and that we are now at the lowest levels of global violence since the 1950s.”

Given that the UN has around 192 member states, and the globe a total of 195/196 countries, excluding territories such as Palestine and the Western Sahara, Zakaria’s statement displays profound optimism, God bless him.

There are 47 countries in Africa; in 2007, the Niger experienced a GDP growth of 4.5 percent, thus, the Niger is one of the 30 African countries listed in his article.

But how reliable are GDP’s and its various components, and to what extent do these estimates and procedures accurately reflect the status quo?

Last year, the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI) saw the Niger bottoming out, ranked last on a list of 177 countries. The list, which excludes vital economic and political indicators such as gender and income inequality, does in fact provide a more inclusive and holistic perspective of multidimensional vectors of poverty and development, than your average all-round vague GDP could. In 2005, the Niger ranked 174 of 177; in other words, the situation has gotten worse on the ground.

Indicators taken into consideration include access to education (primary, secondary and tertiary), health, life expectancy, literacy, standards of living, etc. Some basic facts on the Niger: 54% of the nation has no access to water and 60% of the population lives on less than $1 per day. According to UNICEF, over 67% of Niger youth are coerced into some form of slave labour, many of them in mines and quarries.

Lurking alongside child labour, gross malnutrition and lack of access to education, sanitation etc is the disturbing fact that the Niger has the highest school fees in Africa, with just 2.3 percent of GDP spent on education. One in four kids will die before the age of five. Infant mortality is at 150 births for every 1000.

The Niger is also one of the youngest countries in the world; half the population is below the age of 14. UNICEF states that 40% of these kids are underweight; life expectancy is 43.3 years old.
Whilst the Niger has a population of 14 million, give or take, the approximate cap is 3 doctors for every 100 000 people.
The Index of Economic Freedom lists the Niger as having 86% Economic Freedom, and 89.3% Freedom from Government.

As the above reveal, the people of the Niger are indeed free of, and from, the government who appear to be doing nothing other than allowing foreign entities such as Areva to exploit natural resources like uranium, the number one export. No doubt, certain members of the government are lining their pockets.

Some, like Laouel Kader Mahamadou, former Secratery General of the Niger government, even end up becoming consultants to Areva. No telling what concessions and oversights Mahamadou engaged in to deserve such a reward.

The Economic Freedom may well allude to the fact that few in the Niger have any money to speak of, hence the freedom. Even though the Niger is sorely lacking in access to electricity, they are the third largest suppliers of uranium in the globe, providing up to 32% of France’s energy requirements.

According to Idrissa Ali, National Coordinator for the organisation Publish What You Pay (PWYP), “The agreements that are linked with exploration and exploitation of uranium are highly strategic in nature, placed at the level of relations between states. Under these, the choice of buyers of the product and setting its price in the international market are the prerogative of the former colonial power. The latter is only empowered to transform the uranate to produce atomic energy from its nuclear power plants or to use it for military purposes. Today, energy independence from France relies heavily on uranium in Niger.”

“A neo-colonial framework has led to the signing of mining agreements establishing and functioning of the SOMAÏR (1968) and the COMINAK (1975), which are nothing other than a bias contract making available the uranium in Niger to France,” Ali said.

Why the silence surrounding the issue?

“The silence that has long surrounded the exploitation of uranium in Niger is due to the fact that this ore has always been considered a strategic product by both France and the Niger authorities, through defence agreements signed on April 24, 1961 between the two countries,” he responds.

On the issue of profits, Idrissa states, “From sources close to SOMAÏR and COMINAK, since the beginning of the exploitation and sale of uranium, the revenue generated from the sale has exceeded 2300 billion CFA francs. In this windfall, the state of Niger has garnered just under 300 billion CFA francs.”

In an interview with Areva, the company stated that, “Indirect profits include the income tax on employee’s salaries and the business tax from contractors and different supports provided by the group through its sustainable development program in different areas such as education, water supply and health care.”

How much does a kilogram of uranium go for? “The selling price of uranium as of 2007 is60 €/kg; increasing by around 50% in 2008.”

Who owns Areva and how long has the company been active in the Niger. What percentage of profits does the company receive?
“AREVA has been active in Niger since 1958; the company opened its first mine in 1971 with SOMAÏR (established in 1968) in Arlit. COMINAK was created in 1974, in joint venture with ONAREM (the Niger State Interest Owner) and Japanese and Spanish partners (OURD and ENUSA),” the company said. “Eighty seven percent is owned by a consortium of French public entities (CEA, State and ERAP).”

In a press release issued last year, the company proclaimed that they have, “an answer to the important issues of the 21st Century: the preservation of the planet and accountability to future generations.” The company claimed to operate with complete transparency.

In January 2007, Areva was fined €53 million for price-fixing EU electricity markets; fined alongside the company were 11 other energy cartels including Siemens, (hefty € 396 million). The company has manufacturing facilities in over 43 countries with a commercial/sales network presence in more than 100 countries.

AREVA’s Hoover profile reads that, ‘it is the world leading company in nuclear energy…the only company with a presence in each industrial activity linked to nuclear energy: mining, chemistry, enrichment, combustibles, services, engineering, nuclear propulsion and reactors, treatment, recycling, stabilisation, and dismantling.’

Though the Niger citizens have not received a dime emanating from uranium exports courtesy of the government, the export of uranium is the primary booster relating to the Niger’s GDP. Perhaps the question is less whether the monolithic construct of the economy has been growing, and more, whether this growth has benefited the population. Does GDP translate to income growth for the entire nation, or does it merely reflect the quantity of accumulated wealth present in a specific economic orbit, one that precludes income distribution?

Given the neo-liberal dynamics of wealth redistribution and circulation, especially when linked to rogue regimes or satellite states, the processes of GDP also fail to examine the mechanisms by which the society or nation in question operates, transparently or otherwise.

The Niger, like many African countries and people, are of the Islamic faith, with Islam being the primary ‘religion’ in Africa, yet the environmental and human rights narrative and legal framework of the Niger could not be further from the principles of Islam.

“He has set up the Balance (of Justice) in order that you may not transgress (due) balance. So establish weight with justice and fall not short in the balance.” (Quran 55:7-9)

As the UN’s HDI has shown, the Niger has hit rock bottom; life in this country is desperately lacking in justice for those without voices who have been buried under the tarps of harsh nightmarish scenarios; it’s as if it has been written up by a bad b-grade scriptwriter stretching his imagination to the max. Enough tragedy, the script-doctor would say, bring in some hope.

Whilst Zakaria’s brilliant article on the nature and concept of globalization is heartening, neo-liberal lore has ingrained (perhaps too well) the concept of the trickle down effect.
Something is trickling done for sure, but it isn’t money.




Related Posts

21 Responses to “Lights out in the Niger”

[…] Lights out in the Niger + GDP This is a tricky one; does GDP automatically mean that a country is growing economically or could it be that only certain sectors are growing? Is GDP a good indicator or a misleading one.. Thought Leader

(Report abuse)


dear Khadja,

are you unaware of the fact that at least 40,000 Nigers are chattel slaves, enslaved by their mainly Arabic and Taureg masters? (In a blasphemy to their own religion, since the third or fourth Islamic convocation decreed that no true believer may hold slaves.)

http://www.antislavery.org/homepage/antislavery/award/nigerbackground2004.htm

And any time you’d like to notice that a large part of Niger’s problems are a corrupt govt, biased justice system and institutionalised discrimination as part of their “cultural values”, you might be getting somewhere.

Perhaps you’d like to stop quoting statistics, trying to blame western globalisation (ignoring the chinese and “Traditional” business practices like Black on Black Slavery and donate to free, educate and provide health services and lawyers to Black people, feel free.

Or is the Anti-Slavery society too British for you and Timidria a western funded stooge dedicated to regime change as a CIA funded front for a political NGO interefering with sovereignty and the traditional African way?

Perhaps you’d like to start catching up to where the British were years ago.

http://www.antislavery.org/homepage/antislavery/award/samuraspeech2004.htm

(P.S. Spouting reports and statistics never helped anyone. Getting down to the nitty gritty and doing some hands on work does.)

(Report abuse)

Alisdair Budd on July 5th, 2008 at 7:35 pm

Good interview with Idriss Ali; loads of food for thought. George Alagah says that the best way to measure GDP is by a freezer, who can afford to buy in advance…

(Report abuse)

FHM on July 5th, 2008 at 8:36 pm

Bravo for France, congratulatory for Areva, it’s a pity for Tuaregs
www.north-of-africa.com/article.php3?id_article=453
This year, the state of Niger has distibuted 122 uranium operating licenses. By superimposing the map of northern Niger and the geographic limits of the concessions, we realize the coming catastrophe: Groundwater Pollution, destruction of pasture air, farmers land dispossession, water wells destructions, disruption of the pastoralists management.

Neocolonialism In Niger 2 March 2008
www.north-of-africa.com/article.php3?id_article=481
Today, France has sent French soldiers into Niger — to the Agadez region, where the MNJ Tuareg-led conflict has developed over the past year — to help the current corrupt regime in its campaign against the MNJ, in the same way that France sent its troops to Chad last week to help the corrupt regime there.

http://www.francewatcher.org/images/tatteredfrench.pdf
Chirac talked down democracy on the continent as a frivolous luxury and coddled many of its most
corrupt dictators, the only conditions for entree at the Élysée Palace were chummy personal ties,
flattery of France and business for the clutch of big French companies that have done well for
themselves on the continent by hewing close to power.
In the French world, this ruinous condominium, of French politicians who support corrupt African
leaders while pushing business deals for their friends, is known as FranceAfrique, and it has cost
Africa and France dearly.
Countries like Gabon and Congo Republic and Ivory Coast - one could go on and on - have
squandered generations of wealth and development largely because of it.

(Report abuse)

Oldfox on July 5th, 2008 at 10:23 pm

Khadija

It is never any use to talk of GDP alone - it must always be linked to balance of payments.

If Niger is making money and it is not reaching the people - it is likely to be corrupt leaders.

As for the rest - patriarchy,no contraception, and children having children.

(Report abuse)

Lyndall Beddy on July 5th, 2008 at 10:48 pm

I do not understand economics at all, but it is strange that a country like the Niger, which is so rish in natural resources,has such a poor poulation, and France, which has few natural resources is doing fine.

Whether it is the fault of the government or the “colonial power” or both I don’t know, but something is amiss.

People defend capitalism, but to me it seems better if the people who actually live in the country benefit from the mining done there. Places like Chile who have demanded more control over their mines, seem to be doing well in that regard.

(Report abuse)

Po on July 6th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

Niger gets under $20 per pound of uranium, according to the IMF. Spot price is currently $60 per pound.
(I have seen some articles that say Niger gets only 5% of the wealth from its uranium)
Obviously a lot of corruption at govt level. But what can a poor country do when its govt. is propped up by powerful Western countries?

(Report abuse)

Oldfox on July 6th, 2008 at 7:44 pm

GDP - averaged out production? As we all know, an increase in GDP is a fake statistic if we’re talking real on-the-ground economics. You seem to be painting a multinational company as the biggest baddie in this. Surely bigger is the government selling out its own people’s heritage whilst giving back nothing.

A simple example: Family A earns combined $1,000 a month. We are a family of five and the expenditure is split roughly evenly; every member of the family has sufficient food and water and the children go to school. The roof doesn’t leak, yay! Our ‘GDP’ is thus $200 each

My neighbour is rich. He earns Z$100,000 a month. He has a BMW and dines at top notch restaurants most evenings. He effectively purchased his wife from one of those torrid internet sites and she brought her three small children to live with them. She doesn’t have access to money, the kids don’t go to school and occupy the leaky domestic quarters, which is where the wife goes once she’s ironed the master’s shirts and all that (he’s hardly ever home anyway as he’s off hobnobbing with the rich and famous). But his household’s GDP is $2,000 per capita per month - a hundred times mine.

Now who’s better off really?

Even worse if you start playing ‘percentage increase’ statistics. 4% of a number approaching zero is still zero. 0.4% of a big hefty number is a big hefty number.

And I’ll second Alisdair on the slavery situation. It’s something that needs to be addressed. One can carry on blaming multinationals for modern-day slavery but ultimately most slave masters are not themselves slaves. They have options they choose not to exercise. Enslaving another person is NOT just ‘another way to survive’.

(Report abuse)

Kit on July 6th, 2008 at 10:50 pm

The gov obviously gets stay in power by the money Areva gives.The alliance is between multinational and gov.I thought the stats clearly linked poverty to gov policy.

(Report abuse)

Fhm on July 7th, 2008 at 11:20 am

The multi- nationals pay taxes to the governments.

The governments pocket it instead of using it for the people.

WHAT is complicated about corruption?

(Report abuse)

Lyndall Beddy on July 7th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

Lyndall,

I once worked for a Multinational Corporation. Multinationals make a lot of money via transfer pricing. A type of legalized tax evasion. For this reason, I will never work for a multinational again.
Specialized imports (machinery and equipment used in a factory)are overpriced, by a factor of often 6 to 10 fold.
E.g. a machine that costs $50 000 in the “mother country” costs $500 000 in SA. In other words, a scam to transfer $450 000 TAX FREE out of SA.
The SA factory has no choice but to import the overpriced machinery, as the technology transfer agreement typically mandates the use of such machinery. Or, red tape is put in place to exclude the option of using an equivalent but much lower priced machine from elsewhere.

Exports are underpriced. E.g. a factory gets $100 million for exporting a certain quantity of goods that should actually have netted $200 million. A loss of $100 million to the SA economy.

Multinationals from W. Europe, USA, Canada and Japan all do this, to some or other extent.

I once asked a manager why imported machinery was several times the price paid overseas, and he simply said: “its a way to avoid taxes”. I did not understand this, until I read books on economics later.
Governments are unable to prevent transfer pricing as a typical Trade and Industry dept. (including in countries with far more engineers, accountants etc. than in SA) simply DON’T have sufficient experienced people to be able to uncover the extent of transfer pricing.

I have a conscience. Hence my decision never to work for a MNC again.

(Report abuse)

Oldfox on July 7th, 2008 at 10:02 pm

Oldfox

That is NOT the point! Many years ago my husband was in Rotary - and I complained to them about ANY representative of a multi-national being a member because I did not see how they could keep the oath to be fair to all, when no individual had any authority. I DO therefore understand what you are saying.

However tax schemes etc etc can only happen if the GOVERNMENT of the country is compliant.

In Africa resources can only be mined with the concent of the governments under whatever rules there are. Unfortunately the rules usually are “line my pocket” and I will turn a blind eye.

(Report abuse)

Lyndall Beddy on July 8th, 2008 at 10:24 am

Lyndall,

One again, you’ve missed the point of YOUR OWN statement!

You said: “The multi- nationals pay taxes to the governments”.

I wrote that multi-nationals engage in transfer pricing, which is nothing but tax evasion, and tax evasion is ILLEGAL worldwide.
So, while they do pay some taxes, they cheat on far larger amounts than what they actually pay.

Governments LACK CAPACITY prevent transfer pricing. I made that clear in the preceding post.
I’m not referring to other types of underhand pactices here, just transfer pricing.

Does NOT ONLY apply to African governments. I learnt of transfer pricing definition etc. from a book on the Economy of Latin America, by a Latin American economist - Osvaldo Sunkel, if I recall correctly. The MNCs will screw white ruled countries like Argentina or Brazil just as easily as they will screw a poor African country like Niger.

You also conveniently ignore the fact that opposition parties in developing countries are very often suppressed with the support of Western governments, and sometimes at the request of a MNC.

The following is off the topic you and I are dealing with here, but it is relevant. When the Arms Deal was first announced in 1999, I was vehemently opposed from the outset. Many people, including MANY whites at the time, were all in favour, because they believed the hogwash of creating 60 000 jobs that were promised in industrial offsets. I think the value of the offset exceeded the arms deal price itself. I used to tell people that this was as riduculous as perpetual motion machines, i.e. an impossibility.
Agreed, the SA govt was to blame. But the press and many quite educated citizens were totally fooled. So they supported the govt. (who wants to be a spoil sport and say you’re not interested in the “creation” of 60 000 jobs, never mind it it cost at the then exchange rate all of R0.5 million per job)
Are armaments manufacturers (and the governments of their countries) acting ethically when they lie to governments and to countries that purchase arms?

Some of the “workers” cultivating and harvesting cacao in Cote d”Ivoire are CHILD SLAVES, and the going rate is about $30 to buy a child slave there.
Do chocolate manufacturers like Nestle, Cadbury, Lindt etc really care that some slaves are used in the supply chain?
I don’t think so.

(Report abuse)

Oldfox on July 8th, 2008 at 2:06 pm

Oldfox

Governments that “lack capacity” do so on purpose.

And who is suppressing the opposition in our country - and in Zimbabwe?

And I do not believe the problems of the world are children working - but children not working, and turning to drugs and crime out of boredom and for money. I had to do chores to get my pocket money. Mandela had to look after cattle. However small you were - you contributed to the family.

(Report abuse)

Lyndall Beddy on July 9th, 2008 at 8:47 pm

Lyndall,

You’re implying that the previous Nat govt., also purposely lacked capacity in DTI, Revenue Services etc. so that MNCs could exploit us via transfer pricing. (I learnt about transfer pricing in SA during 1980s).

Lyndall, are you condoning child SLAVERY??????

Child slavery is an abomination that stinks to high heaven. Children are not infrequently beaten and/or raped if they do not produce/harvest enough goods/produce.
Ditto for adult slavery of females.
There are an estimated 27 million slaves in the world today. Only in the year 1861, when slavery was still being “abolished” were there more slaves than there are today.
Here is a recent book, that has an example of 2 Lithuanian teenage girls traded outside a coffee shop in Gatwick airport - they were sold for GBP 3000 each.
A Crime So Monstrous: Face-to-Face with Modern-Day Slavery
Hardcover: 352 pages
Free Press; 1st edition (March 11, 2008)
ISBN-13: 978-0743290074
(available at Exclusive Books)
Previews at e.g. http://acrimesomonstrous.com

(Report abuse)

Oldfox on July 9th, 2008 at 10:48 pm

Oldfox

OK. If transfer pricing is illegal why are these multi-nationals not caught and fined? The duty of government is to govern - not to take bribes to look the other way! And not having enough trained people is a feeble excuse!

It does not matter how many whites did or did not support the arms deal - our GOVERNMENT ahould have known better - or otherwise why are they there? What did we need arms for anyhow - we were not at war? And why did Mbeki need a smarter and fancier private presidential plane than Mandela managed with?

Even when companies get away with tax evasion - just the employment of staff provides jobs and PAYE and VAT. What we can’t have is what we do have - almost no NEW industrial development.

I said children working, not slavery or trafficing Really! Thanks for the book reference though.

I have a friend who employs a full time maid - but not in her own house, for her 10 tenants. She wants her daughters to learn to make their own beds, keep their own rooms tidy, and help with the washing up - i.e. to grow up responsible!

Jewish boys get circumcised at about 12/13. Xhosa boys are I think about the same age. Then they are men not boys. So what are they supposed to do till they are 18? Hang around while mom cooks and cleans for them? And suddenly at 18 they will become responsible and hardworking?

I don’t know whether there are child slaves in the Cote d’ Ivoire or not, but I do know that any child would rather help than do nothing. I also do NOT believe everything I read on the Internet. If I was to get involved with child slavery - it would have to be a full time committment. Other people, with better contacts and backing, are doing that. I get involved where I think I can make a difference.

Did you loll around on your bed while you were a child while your mother cooked and cleaned for you? I doubt it!

(Report abuse)

Lyndall Beddy on July 10th, 2008 at 7:47 pm

Lyndall,

There are around 200 million child workers/labourers in the world. Many of the female child workers/labourers too, are beaten/raped if they do not produce enough. They do all kinds of jobs, working in brick factories (often as young as 4 years of age) or making carpets (small fingers can make finer carpets than adult fingers) etc.
They do NOT go to school, they work full time, sometimes 7 days a week, and 10-12 hours per day or even longer. If they work 7 days a week, they have no time to play. They do not have a childhood, in the normal sense. They are typically intentionally underfed. Many live on site, and don’t see parents and siblings for very long periods.
Child labourers earn a pittence, and are technically not slaves. Child slaves are owned by their owners, and have no rights whatsoever.
Child labour, of the type I have described above, is, like child slavery, an abomination that stinks to high heaven.

I was not debating household (or farm) chores done by children who live normal lives, i.e. they live with their families, go to school, can talk to friends, play games/sport etc if they wish.

(Report abuse)

Oldfox on July 11th, 2008 at 4:09 pm

Oldfox

I answered this but the answer dissapeared. Will post again if it is not there by Monday afternoon. This IS the weekend.

(Report abuse)

Lyndall Beddy on July 13th, 2008 at 5:36 pm

Oldfox

My comment did dissapear. Forgot what I said. But we are arguing at cross purposes - about different things. I have already said that I am not an expert on the topic and don’t intend to become one because I don’t have the time.

If I was going to do it - my research would be a lot more in depth than newspapers or internet.

(Report abuse)

Lyndall Beddy on July 14th, 2008 at 3:14 pm

[…] be fair, it’s France, which generates 80 per cent of its electricity from nuclear, that has the big stake in Niger’s uranium. Not that Niger’s people slumped, as they are, at 177 in the United Nations Human Development […]

(Report abuse)

More energy insecurity - Chicken Yoghurt on July 22nd, 2008 at 6:40 pm

Pretoria News Oct 28 2008.
West African judges have fined the state of Niger the equivalent of 15 000 Euros for failing to protect a woman (citizen of Niger) from being sold into slavery at the age of 12.

(Report abuse)

Oldfox on October 28th, 2008 at 9:59 pm

Leave a Reply

All comments must be approved by our editors, click here to read the editorial guidelines for comments. Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.

Send me the Thought Leader daily newsletter

We have put a word limit of 250 words on all your comments


words left

more posts
By Prof Dennis Brutus When conditions are so unseemly even the blind are made aghast and police are firing rubber bullets* in defense of the ind...
It's that time of year again: shiny posters attached to lampposts (beckoning people toward the light?); politicians pole dancing for votes, faces (and...
Q&A with the IFP on a few front-line issues regarding their environmental resource policies (political ecology). The questionnaire -- sent to majo...
Q&A with the DA on a few front-line issues regarding their environmental resources policies (political ecology). The questionnaire -- sent to majo...
Q&A with the ID on a few front-line issues regarding their environmental resources policies (political ecology). The questionnaire -- sent to majo...
latest activity
Blog Statistics
Total reads 161355
Total comments 1260
Khadija's tags
advertisement
    Mail & Guardian Online Headlines
  • National
  • Business
  • Africa
  • World
  • Sport
All material copyright of the author, or the Mail & Guardian, unless otherwise specified
Author Login
Afrigator