<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook: Pokes vs real penetration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:41:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Posetti</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/comment-page-1/#comment-4803</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Posetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/#comment-4803</guid>
		<description>Darren – very witty engagement with ‘poking’ but you’ve overlooked all the double entendre value of the much hipper form of FB flirtation: ‘Super-poking’. Yep, it’s poking with pictures and involves a multitude of options – throwing a chicken at, trout-slapping, cheering for, or engaging in all manner of lewd acts with your ‘friends’.

But on a more serious note, it is absolutely possible to engage intellectually on FB – how is it any less a potential vehicle for such interaction than blogging? I’m a journalism academic from Australia and I use FB to engage my current and former students in debates about politics, reporting and ethics. It’s also a vehicle for mentoring, career advice and professional interaction for them. And, I’ve witnessed relationships blossom in this space in a meaningful way – FB friendships are not all about shallow interaction!

There’s no point hiding from this phenomenon – social networking online is here to stay and instead of eschewing it, why not make it serve your professional, educational, intellectual and social interests? Putting your head in a hole never solves fear of the unknown. 

I’ve blogged about all this myself if you’re interested:

http://www.j-scribe.com/2007/10/facebook-face-off.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren – very witty engagement with ‘poking’ but you’ve overlooked all the double entendre value of the much hipper form of FB flirtation: ‘Super-poking’. Yep, it’s poking with pictures and involves a multitude of options – throwing a chicken at, trout-slapping, cheering for, or engaging in all manner of lewd acts with your ‘friends’.</p>
<p>But on a more serious note, it is absolutely possible to engage intellectually on FB – how is it any less a potential vehicle for such interaction than blogging? I’m a journalism academic from Australia and I use FB to engage my current and former students in debates about politics, reporting and ethics. It’s also a vehicle for mentoring, career advice and professional interaction for them. And, I’ve witnessed relationships blossom in this space in a meaningful way – FB friendships are not all about shallow interaction!</p>
<p>There’s no point hiding from this phenomenon – social networking online is here to stay and instead of eschewing it, why not make it serve your professional, educational, intellectual and social interests? Putting your head in a hole never solves fear of the unknown. </p>
<p>I’ve blogged about all this myself if you’re interested:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.j-scribe.com/2007/10/facebook-face-off.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.j-scribe.com/2007/10/facebook-face-off.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mischa &#38; Mvulane</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/comment-page-1/#comment-4772</link>
		<dc:creator>Mischa &#38; Mvulane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/#comment-4772</guid>
		<description>The virtual world deprives us of a chance to live. Don&#039;t you suppose it&#039;s better to engage intellectualy rather than &#039;just chat&#039;. Atleast then spending time on the internet&#039;s worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The virtual world deprives us of a chance to live. Don&#8217;t you suppose it&#8217;s better to engage intellectualy rather than &#8216;just chat&#8217;. Atleast then spending time on the internet&#8217;s worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Catto</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/comment-page-1/#comment-4770</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Catto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/#comment-4770</guid>
		<description>I want out of facebook. I really do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want out of facebook. I really do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy-Mari Cloete</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/comment-page-1/#comment-4766</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy-Mari Cloete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/#comment-4766</guid>
		<description>Does it matter that there is no ONE real value to Facebook? Facebook users (mostly young professionals) are not interested in how many business contacts they can connect with.
We&#039;re interested in interacting with each other. We&#039;re promoting ourselves. We&#039;re poking that cute guy with the blue eyes and hoping he&#039;ll poke back.
Nothing surprising about that. The real value is what YOU get out of it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it matter that there is no ONE real value to Facebook? Facebook users (mostly young professionals) are not interested in how many business contacts they can connect with.<br />
We&#8217;re interested in interacting with each other. We&#8217;re promoting ourselves. We&#8217;re poking that cute guy with the blue eyes and hoping he&#8217;ll poke back.<br />
Nothing surprising about that. The real value is what YOU get out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/comment-page-1/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/#comment-4765</guid>
		<description>There you go. I couldn&#039;t agree more.
Let me qualify my previous &quot;Oh its over-rated&quot; remark ...
At a US$15 billion valuation (for Facebook), I suspect that the Web 2.0 bubble is getting quite nice and taught ... there&#039;s going to be some popping going on in the not too distant future. But it&#039;ll likely get bigger (the bubble) before it goes bang.
It is astonishing how short peoples&#039; memories can be, the &#039;dot.com&#039; bubble having shaken things a mere 5 years ago.
As for finding something useful in Facebook, there&#039;s no question about it ... I find it extraordinarily useful. But probably in ways that have nothing to do with its social core.
Using Facebook as I do, primarily as a business network building tool, I am gaining insight into networks, people and associated connections that the Xings, LinkedIns and other business networks have singularly failed to give me.
I have created a larger network of accessible, professional people in 6 months on Facebook, than I managed to do in 5 years on LinkedIn.
They&#039;ve got something right ... and its the viral nature of social networking ...
As for the REAL value ... the jury is still out on that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you go. I couldn&#8217;t agree more.<br />
Let me qualify my previous &#8220;Oh its over-rated&#8221; remark &#8230;<br />
At a US$15 billion valuation (for Facebook), I suspect that the Web 2.0 bubble is getting quite nice and taught &#8230; there&#8217;s going to be some popping going on in the not too distant future. But it&#8217;ll likely get bigger (the bubble) before it goes bang.<br />
It is astonishing how short peoples&#8217; memories can be, the &#8216;dot.com&#8217; bubble having shaken things a mere 5 years ago.<br />
As for finding something useful in Facebook, there&#8217;s no question about it &#8230; I find it extraordinarily useful. But probably in ways that have nothing to do with its social core.<br />
Using Facebook as I do, primarily as a business network building tool, I am gaining insight into networks, people and associated connections that the Xings, LinkedIns and other business networks have singularly failed to give me.<br />
I have created a larger network of accessible, professional people in 6 months on Facebook, than I managed to do in 5 years on LinkedIn.<br />
They&#8217;ve got something right &#8230; and its the viral nature of social networking &#8230;<br />
As for the REAL value &#8230; the jury is still out on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy-Mari Cloete</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/comment-page-1/#comment-4762</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy-Mari Cloete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/#comment-4762</guid>
		<description>Its over-rated only if you fail to find something useful in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its over-rated only if you fail to find something useful in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/comment-page-1/#comment-4758</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/#comment-4758</guid>
		<description>Oh its over-rated alright. As is television, the movies, sex, the web, magazines ... bla bla bla.
But at &lt;b&gt;some&lt;/b&gt; point, they can all hit just the right spot. And bingo ... you get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh its over-rated alright. As is television, the movies, sex, the web, magazines &#8230; bla bla bla.<br />
But at <b>some</b> point, they can all hit just the right spot. And bingo &#8230; you get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mischa &#38; Mvulane</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/comment-page-1/#comment-4750</link>
		<dc:creator>Mischa &#38; Mvulane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/darrensmith/2007/11/01/facebook-pokes-versus-real-penetration/#comment-4750</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s even more amazing that a College student started all this. We are not on Facebook. We think it&#039;s overrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s even more amazing that a College student started all this. We are not on Facebook. We think it&#8217;s overrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

