Loading ...Originally featured in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer on June 30, 2010 and written by Danielle Nierenberg, Molly Theobald and Stephanie Hanson.
It’s easy to feel overwhelmed by the fact that 1 billion people worldwide are going to bed hungry every night. And, in the United States, it is easy to look at sub-Saharan Africa — where the majority of people depend on agriculture for their livelihood but still do not get enough to eat — and want to just throw money at the problem. Or worse, to give up hope.
But when one talks to farmers on the ground in Kenya, Ghana, Madagascar, and other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, it becomes clear that throwing money at the problem isn’t enough.
It’s not that funding isn’t needed. With increasing extreme weather events due to climate change, skyrocketing food prices, and the highest number of hungry people in human history, funding for agriculture to alleviate poverty and hunger is needed now more than ever. The new multibillion-dollar US food security and agriculture initiative, known as “Feed the Future” is a timely recognition of this need.
But this money needs to be directed at the right kind of agriculture projects. Instead of silver-bullet, high-technology fixes, agriculture funding should focus on the many low-tech, African-led innovations that are already helping to alleviate hunger and poverty in environmentally sustainable ways all over the continent. As the global community looks for solutions to the problem of global hunger, it’s important to remember something that we’ve heard again and again: farmers already know what they need.
One Acre Fund, an agriculture organisation that serves rural smallholder farmers in Kenya and Rwanda, was built on this idea. From the beginning, we sought to provide farmers with tools to feed their families and to increase their incomes by asking them what they needed — and listening to what they said.
For example, we knew that farmers needed improved seed and fertiliser, but, after many conversations, we discovered that farmers also needed financing to purchase those inputs, as well as education on how to use them. And, they needed access to a market to sell their crop after harvest. Our service model — credit, inputs, education and market facilitation — addresses all of these needs.
Now, when a farmer enrols with One Acre Fund, she joins as part of a group of six to twelve farmers and receives an in-kind loan of seed and fertiliser, which is guaranteed by her group members. One Acre Fund delivers this seed and fertiliser to a market point within one mile of where she lives, and a field officer provides in-field training on land preparation, planting, fertiliser application, and weeding. Critically, our farmers repay us, which keeps the organisation focused on customer service, and means that One Acre Fund can grow to serve more farmers season after season.
One Rwandan couple benefiting from One Acre Fund’s programme, Edith and Gilbert, has seen an 80% increase in their bean harvest in the past two years. Now, not only do they have enough to feed themselves and their three children, they are also able to afford school fees. And they are making plans for the future. While just two years earlier they were frequently going without enough to eat, they now dream of purchasing more land and expanding their farm to include livestock.
Farmer-led innovation is happening all over the continent. In Mozambique, the organisation Prolinnova, along with the Spanish NGO Centro de Iniciativas para la Cooperación/Batá, and the National Farmers Union of Mozambique, Unac, organised a workshop for farmers from all over the country to get together, share their experiences, and learn about different agriculture innovations being practised in other communities. Throughout the event, farmers presented other innovations and practices — including how to prevent diseases that affect their crops and fruit trees and how to raise farmed fish. This event was the culmination of a series of workshops that Batá/Prolinnova/Unac held in 2009 to help farmers identify innovations in their communities. Workshops like these spread information about innovations that work, and, ultimately, help farmers value — and invest in — their own knowledge.
“We have enough innovations,” says Xavier Rakotonjanahary, the rice breeding coordinator at Madagascar’s Centre National de la Recherche Apliquee au Developpement Rural/Fofifa or the National Centre for Rural Development. His organisation works with farmers to adapt different technologies and innovations to fit their own needs through extension services and on-farm testing.
Across sub-Saharan Africa, millions of farmers are working hard to eke out a living with poor seed, no fertiliser, limited access to credit, and no insurance. Improved seed, fertiliser, credit, and insurance all exist today. Adapting these products to fit the needs and resources of smallholders will require many hours of trudging through fields and learning from farmers. For solutions to reduce hunger and improve agriculture livelihoods, don’t look to Washington DC, or even to Nairobi. Look to the farmers living miles away from paved roads in rural Rwanda, Mozambique and Madagascar. Farmers know what they need.
Stephanie Hanson is the director of policy and research at the One Acre Fund; Danielle Nierenberg is co-project director of the Worldwatch Institute’s Nourishing the Planet project and Molly Theobald is a food and agriculture research fellow at Worldwatch www.nourishingtheplanet.org.
The upsurge of African farmers helping themself with the help of scientists and philantropists from elsewhere sounds like a recipe for real success. I fully agree with you that agricultural experts from other countries need to not just impart their knowledge but also listen to the wisdom from farmers who know the local conditions better.
The one thing that still concerns me in all this is the “improved” seed and fertiliser input. I hope this does not mean GI seed and chemical fertiliser made in an overseas factory. Whilst not being totally anti-GI minded, the risk of runaway infestation of local habitats by stronger GI plants from small lots is a concern. Is any work being done on increasing yields and developing a market for indigenous crops or (re-)discovering plants that can be used as food crops locally?
A bigger variety than just the European selection is not only a more palatable goal but a much safer one, I feel, to ensure food security globally. I was once shown and got a taste of a potatoe-like tuber in Namibia that I have not come across since. There was also a lucerne-type plant that was really delicious, prepared as spinach, that is now just a memory.
(Report abuse)