Coenraad Bezuidenhout
Coenraad Bezuidenhout

Nick Griffin, prejudice and Mandela’s greatest gift to us…

British National Party leader Nick Griffin reminds us it is not only in South Africa where public personalities revert to the most basic prejudices to advance their cause or please their followers. Labelling former president Nelson Mandela a “murderous terrorist” may be an extreme example, but those who like public recognition often revert to such tactics to sidestep developments that may side-line their interests.

Section 9 of the South African Constitution prohibits discrimination of all sorts, yet politicians and opinion-makers are not shy to mobilise racial prejudice to their advantage. Think Gauteng Premier Nomvula Mokonyane’s recent “white gevaar” outburst, Pinky Khoabane when she’s got Helen Zille in her aim, AfriForum preaching victimhood to conservative Afrikaners and Peter Marais now trying to pull an AfriForum on coloured people in the Western Cape.

It’s also not limited to South Africa where it goes beyond express or implied racism. Despite his muted subsequent support for same-sex unions, President Jacob Zuma has made some homophobic statements to impress an audience before. But then we have arguably seen worse in France recently when that country belatedly legalised gay marriage. So too, a recent parliamentary spat between Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard and the leader of the opposition of that country suggested that it is not only Floyd Shivambu that can raise the ire of the farer sex.

The rough and tumble of public life can lead politicians and opinion-makers into making some pretty callous remarks, even when the desire to demonstrate a legitimate point may be perfectly sincere. In this regard witness Zille referring to South Africans moving from the Eastern Cape in search of better services and opportunities in the Western Cape as economic refugees, an unfortunate term to use to refer to communities where xenophobic violence is always close to the surface. For this, she has since registered some apology.

Should Madiba still have been active on the public stage, what would his reaction be to Griffin? I bet it would not be far off his reactions to other assaults on his dignity. Assaults, such as those of Margaret Thatcher, who also once thought of him as a terrorist; or, such as that of Louis Luyt, who prized his ego more than dragging the former president to court — an action he would arguably not dared have taken in days of white presidents.

Mandela would recognise the rights of public opponents to express their opinions and prefer certain actions within the law. He would most certainly have defended his position spiritedly, but also with dignity. Most likely, he would also have opened the door to people coming together by extending his hand.

This is important, because if anything, Griffin’s callous quips, as well as the many examples — the local and international examples listed above, as well as those which were not — remind us that there is one important thing that we have not yet done. We have not yet chosen to fully receive Madiba’s greatest gift to us: the gift of his example.

Tags: , ,

  • Mandela Day – a neocolonial exercise in the commodification of the good black
  • The A to Z of things we cannot blame on apartheid
  • It’s do nothing days in Zuma’s la-la land
  • Mandela the communist?
  • 6 Responses to “Nick Griffin, prejudice and Mandela’s greatest gift to us…”

    1. Richard #

      A terrorist is one who uses terror against civilians to further their political cause. It does not mean that the cause is not just. By that criterion, Nelson Mandela was a terrorist. Many people who later became civilian leaders were terrorists. For instance, Menachim Begin, Prime MInister of Israel, was a terrorist. The Boer general De la Rey, was a terrorist. Many governments also use terror – look at modern-day Syria, for example, or the previous Pinochet regime in Chile – although the term “terrorist” is generally reserved for groups not in government. A statement of fact does not necessarily imply moral endorsement. By the definition of “terrorist”, Nick Griffin is correct.

      June 13, 2013 at 12:21 pm
    2. russell #

      Perhaps our greatest gift to Madiba would be to… “keep alive the ideals of the struggle for which he lived”
      Sisonke Msimang

      June 13, 2013 at 12:40 pm
    3. @Coenraa Bezuidenhoudt. Sorry mate.

      You’ve gone a bit off the track by saying Thatcher called Mandela a terrorist. Where did you get that info from? Apparently, she did call the ANC a terrorist organisation after the ANC said they would bomb British interests in SA.

      So what is a terrorist? Let’s ask Barack Obama, after the Boston street Bombings: “”Any time bombs are used to target innocent civilians it is an act of terrorism.”

      So with that statement by Obama, and the ANC’s “proud” history of targetting civilians, fellow country men and women, makes them no less than what Obama states above.

      I didn’t say it. Obama said, but it’s a term we are all familiar with. Just some people ooh or ah around the subject to be politically correct , aka, lacking moral fibre.

      June 14, 2013 at 1:55 am
    4. @Henri Le Riche, you are busy feeding people lies, you are ignorant, the anc never targeted innocent civilians,,

      June 14, 2013 at 8:15 pm
    5. Momma Cyndi #

      siphokuhle dludla

      What were they targeting in Amanzimtoti? Despite all the nonsense spoken, Magoos was nothing but a form of News Cafe type of place with zero military. Then there was a bomb in a bank (Roodepoort area?), one at Ellis Park, at least two at various Wimpy …. those are just off the top of my head. They WERE a terrorist organisation and they DID target civillians

      June 15, 2013 at 12:24 pm
    6. Madiba is an example of courage and perseverance against what he thought
      at the time was not right. I solute him, as a white person. Great Man !
      God loves ALL, unconditionally.

      June 27, 2013 at 1:50 pm

    Leave a Reply

     characters available