« Blog Home
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

Later today, history will be made when, for the first time, a South African journalist will be punished for blogging. A hearing is due to be held at Avusa (formerly Johnnic Communications) at 3pm today (Thursday) to decide the fate of a Sowetan sub-editor, who has been found guilty of ”gross misconduct” for what he has written in his blog.

The offending blog posting appeared on Thought Leader two weeks ago, resulting in the immediate suspension of one Llewellyn Kriel. He is an old-style journalist from the school of hard knocks, hard living and a hard-assed attitude to the establishment. At the time of writing, he is employed as a sub-editor.

His description of what happened after he blogged about the atmosphere at Johncom is almost Kafka-esque. It suggests a huge gulf between media reality and management’s perception of media reality.

Most revealing of all is the comment from management, as alleged by Kriel, that “sub-editors are not journalists”. If this really is the attitude of management, then there is little chance they will understand the concept, role and potential of the blog.

Little wonder that Kriel has already been found guilty of bringing the Sowetan into disrepute and of disclosing confidential corporate information.

What managements appears to have missed is the old media principle of protecting freedom of speech, and the very new new-media principle that suggests the best journalists will have the ability to control the distribution of their writing.

In those contexts, it is difficult to imagine anything that could contribute more to bringing a newspaper into disrepute than punishing one of its journalists for a blog that discusses matters that are already in the public domain.

In the interests of protecting a worthy institution like the Sowetan, and to ensure that its management does not damage its own reputation too much in the pursuit of its managerial duties, and in order to protect other media bosses from making the same mistakes, here are a few tips for publishers dealing with the world of bloggers for the first time:

1.Great journalists need an outlet. Not everything they write or want to write fits into your publication, either for reasons of space or subject matter. Of course, you may wish to own their souls, but that is somewhat 18th century.

2.Blogs are your friends. Or they want to be. By providing a blogging platform on your website, you extend your brand into a directly related medium, and you achieve a number of powerful goals (or, at least, they should be goals), namely:

  • You create an additional avenue of interest for your readers, thus increasing traffic to your web site and reader engagement with the site.
  • You create a platform for interaction between journalists and readers, and by extension between the publication and its audience. This, in turn, again increases reader engagement.
  • You give your journalists a focus for their natural aspirations for self-expression.
  • You build your journalists’ personal brands. Believe it or not, this is good for your publication, even if you believe it is only good for the journalist. It adds to the credibility of the publication, and gives it a more human face. In the case of sub-editors, who are often the best and most seasoned journalists on your staff (and yes, they are journalists, and always have been), it gives them the opportunity to emerge from behind the anonymity of the headlines they write and the copy they polish.
  • 3. Blogs are connected. One of the core principles of blogging is to link to what is being said elsewhere and to reference other blogs. This means that both the good and the evil that men do (with apologies to Wullium S) is not oft interred with their blogs, but lives on in a world of links, tags and content aggregators. This is bad news for any publisher who treats blogs with disdain. For example, if today’s 3pm decision sounds anything like a dismissal, it will be heard around the world.

    4. Blogs are not a fad. Before blogs there were personal web pages, and before web pages there were personal journals. The difference, in blogging, is that readers of the blog can interact directly with it, enabling a writer to engage directly with his or her audience in a structured and controllable manner. In other words, the blog represents evolution of expression, not invention or even reinvention thereof. So, in answer to the next question, no, blogs are not going away very soon.

    5. Freedom of speech is as important in blogs as it is in newspapers. The main difference between the two is that the latter can be censored and the former can’t. Suppression of newspapers or journalists, in the 21st century, leads to greater attention being paid to their messages being moved to blogs. And attempts to censor blogs will be as damaging as attempts to censor printed publications. When the censor is, in fact, a printed publication, it is not hard to see whose reputation would suffer the most damage.

    6. Guidelines for staff who are blogging are not only acceptable, but also recommended. However, it must incorporate an understanding of what blogs represent and can represent. Knee-jerk responses to blogging will simply damage your reputation.

    For providing the opportunity to share these principles with the publishing world, this week’s Blogger of the Week is Llewellyn Kriel. Welcome to the Amablogoblogo team, sir. We look forward in great anticipation to your blog being allowed to continue its residence in this neighbourhood.




    Related Posts

    27 Responses to “Blogger of the Week: SA’s first media blog casualty”

    Reminds me of the attitude Big Music had to digital downloads a few years ago - what they didn’t understand they attempted to squash.
    With predictably messy results.
    Tsk, tsk.

    (Report abuse)

    Travis Lyle on November 29th, 2007 at 12:31 pm

    Very good discussion piece, I think we’re going to have some fun here. The freedom that blogging provides is both exciting and a bit frightening.

    ON BLOGGING
    With the vastly greater freedom must come some sort of responsibility, OR MUST IT?

    Does the responsibility for the quality of what we read rest with the blogger or with us, the readers?

    Will we all develop a narrower perspective as we each read only that news and those blogs that match our point of view? (Consider us M&G readers as an example)

    ON WHAT WE DO AFTER WORK HOURS
    I was once fired for getting a speeding fine on my way to work (OK it was 142 in an 80Km area). I wasn’t late for work though. Could you imagine that happening today?

    Conditions of employment are relaxing all the time and I think that the strange incidents in the media (including the article in the Beeld on Satanism) are just knee jerk reactions from the past.

    I also think that journalists are vastly better these days because of the competition from other media. Would it be fair to say that journalists (and others) who like writing controversial pieces are getting an outlet through blogging. The standards are more relaxed and there isn’t a sub at your shoulder. No one is forcing us to read this stuff!

    And controversial pieces create discussion/argument which is health and can also be enjoyable.

    (Report abuse)

    John Bond on November 29th, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    Let the discussions begin!

    (Report abuse)

    Andre on November 29th, 2007 at 1:21 pm

    It strikes me as Machievellian, Orwellian and Huxley-like to say the least. In the new century, the bad guys are the old establishment media honchos who are doing everything they can to preserve a fast-diminishing system of privilege. In the new era of the digital commons, everyone can publish, and that’s what riles the bosses the most. Down with Stalinist corporate media!!

    (Report abuse)

    David Robert Lewis on November 29th, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    If media management want exclusive control over what their employees (read journalists) write and say outside of the workplace, how about paying them better for a start?

    (Report abuse)

    Lionel on November 29th, 2007 at 3:06 pm

    I couldn’t agree with you more. However, it’s very important for bloggers, especially those who are already employed or work for media company - to avoid writing about anything that could affect the image of that company unless one does that after resigning. Maybe that would sound more reasonable.

    Just imagine Jacob Zuma becoming the country’s next president and saying something bad about the ANC on ANC TODAY? And not only that maybe saying something about Thabo Mbeki’s leadership? If he does that - he’s likely to appear before its structure or committee.

    Sometimes - no matter how difficult - we just have to watch what we say. And yes, we all know that we have a “right” to freedom of expression and speech. But as long as such affect the other - that’s where we have trouble.

    Sometimes reading my own blog makes me wonder what Thabo Mbeki would say when he looks at it or maybe reading it? Maybe you should have a loot at it.

    But that’s freedom of expression, right? And by the way - i’m not member of ANC, at least for now!

    (Report abuse)

    Akanyang Merementsi on November 29th, 2007 at 3:18 pm

    I love that term Machiavellian. Has anyone ever read The Prince - by Nicolò Machiavelli
    Written c. 1505, published 1515 - Translated by W. K. Marriott, 1908

    http://www.constitution.org/mac/prince00.htm

    The phrase Machiavellian slides off the tongue and like Orwell and Huxley, his work is often quoted, sometimes a bit out of context.

    (Report abuse)

    John Bond on November 29th, 2007 at 3:22 pm

    Wow. So I take it we will soon be reading about the 8 displinary hearings underway at the M&G, including the case of the staffer who dared take their cat to the vet during office hours? C’mon fearless bloggers, bite that hand that feeds.

    (Report abuse)

    M&G sub on November 29th, 2007 at 4:26 pm

    Let’s hear it for freedom of speech, Arthur (oh, and sub-editors, too).
    Stevie Godson
    (Senior sub-editor, Daily Dispatch)
    PS: Peter says ‘hi’

    (Report abuse)

    Stevie Godson on November 29th, 2007 at 4:43 pm

    Some interesting things in the thought leader guidelines you might want to challenge. They appear to attack free speech. I quote:
    “All comments first have to be approved by the editorial team before they appear on the website.” - what is this, Stalinism?
    “Discuss the issues, not the people. Comments launching personal attacks or that are hurtful and insulting will not be accepted. Respect other people’s views and beliefs.” - Unless the attack is on a rival media group, in which case say whatever you damn well please.
    “There is a difference between criticising a political party, a religion, an organisation, a cultural group or a community and unreasonably attacking such bodies.” - Again, unless they are rivals.
    “Unacceptable comments will be deleted without notification.” - Wow. Free speech, this.

    (Report abuse)

    M&G sub on November 29th, 2007 at 5:17 pm

    To M&G sub:
    1. Thought Leader is a moderated blogging platform. It is not a free-for-all blogging website. Moderation is implemented by many such platforms — the Guardian’s Comment Is Free and recently the New York Times are examples. It’s not Stalinism.
    2. A company is not a person.
    3. You are criticising the M&G (why, I don’t quite see) and yet your comment is allowed …
    4. Unacceptable comments will definitely be deleted without notification. Often those who leave utterly racist or slanderous comments don’t even supply a valid email address. Our comment rules are fair, we feel.

    (Report abuse)

    Riaan Wolmarans on November 29th, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    I am not surprised by how the editor of the Sowetan has responded to the bog posted by Kriel. A paper where I began my political writing career at - for newspapers - in 1999 has become heavily managerialist and authoritarian of late.

    Because of a dispute or rather misunderstanding about a piece I sumbitted for publication in 2006 they eventually refused to pay me AFTER they carried it! When I enquired they agreed to pay but then the editor stepped in and ordered that I not be paid. I was going to challenge the decision to reverse an earlier editorial decision to pay but decided not to waste my time with the paper any longer. They also have an undeclared but effectively a narrow Africanist chauvinism at the paper which does not therefore surprise me that they are repressively acting against Kriel. It is probably too why they acted against me last year and thereby violated an agreement to pay me for an article of mine they published. In fact a media lawyer has advised me that it is not too late to challenge this blatant unfairness. I have kept all the relevant correspondence.

    It was not like that when Don Mattera and Aggrey Klasste were Associate Editor and Editor respectively in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s.
    Things at the Sowetan have changed. I wish Kriel success in this case.

    (Report abuse)

    Ebrahim Harvey on November 29th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    I wanted to comment but seeing all these deep comments I would rather give my one cent.

    (Report abuse)

    esvl on November 29th, 2007 at 6:35 pm

    ON BLOGGING: With the vastly greater freedom must come some sort of responsibility, OR MUST IT?

    No. Bloggers have absolutely no responsibility to anyone. They can write exactly what they want. They are answerable to no-one, but their own selves.

    People can attempt to oppress bloggers, try to coerce them, but bloggers are free as the birds to fly wherever they wish. No limits.

    (Report abuse)

    Richard Catto on November 30th, 2007 at 5:31 am

    As a journalist myself, I find it incredible that the same media companies who will jump to defend freedom when legislation such as the Film and Publications Act amendment pose a threat, are the same ones to throw such considerations out of the window when the shoe is on the other foot.

    How can we take seriously the commitment of the media houses to the principle?

    (Report abuse)

    Scotty on November 30th, 2007 at 6:01 am

    […] information he divulged about the company on his blog. Technology analyst Arthur Goldstuck has been reporting on the event, and his last post mentioned that Kriel appeared before a disciplinary hearing yesterday. Goldstuck […]

    (Report abuse)


    I wpu;d like to comment on Akanyang’s perspective. I am sure you have been up to date about what is going on around our country and you have been observant at all times towards what is going to happen with our democracy. let me tell you one thing. You have never heard Jacob Zuma critize any one in the party. I want to ask you a question. Why do you think JZ will say something bad about his party when he becomes a national president? Why now because he should have said what he want to say about the people who has been critisezing his name and talk him bad in the media, instead he is been incontent in peace,, You have never heard him saying something bad about one of his party member because he respect the values of other people, so as you have to learn about other people’s values and moral.

    I know you said it in the matter of freedom of expression but be reasonable and put up yourself in the right spot of commenting before judging.

    (Report abuse)

    Martin on November 30th, 2007 at 10:22 am

    Riaan - Do you want me to get started on you? Then we’ll see what happens …

    (Report abuse)

    M&G sub on November 30th, 2007 at 11:56 am

    Can’t help telling everybody: “I told you so”. Guess what, I’m the first person in SA history to have his work deleted by a M&G apparatchik. If you want to read about the ongoing saga involving the David Robert Lewis Blog and its battle to keep itself uncensored and free from hostile takeovers, visit http://davidrobertlewis.wordpress.com
    Oh, and when I grow up, I want to be like Vince Maher

    (Report abuse)

    David Robert Lewis on November 30th, 2007 at 1:01 pm

    WOW!!!

    Forget about the phrase “fighting like cat and dog…” Just let members of the press rubbish each other and you have MUCH MORE FUN.

    And we expect these people to give us an objective view when they’re reporting?

    Wrestling was never this much fun.

    (Report abuse)

    John Bond on November 30th, 2007 at 2:43 pm

    The Sub-Editor deserved that dismisal if he breached the contract of employment.The exercise of freedom of expression through bloggs requires controls to ensure that it does endanger other peoples’s freedom.

    (Report abuse)

    John Mathayi on November 30th, 2007 at 10:57 pm

    blogger off, media police!

    (Report abuse)

    Margaret Irvine on December 1st, 2007 at 9:22 am

    in fact, since (and I quote) “All comments must be approved by our editors, click here to read the editorial guidelines for comments. Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.”, surely the editorial team have sacked themselves since they endorsed the blog in the first place? The Sowetan MUST come out for freedom of expression against the management of the father company.

    (Report abuse)

    Margaret Irvine on December 1st, 2007 at 11:19 am

    Oh, well said, Arthur!!

    (Report abuse)

    Sub on December 5th, 2007 at 2:42 pm

    Okay. An admission. Tried to bait you Thought Leader guys into some kind of unwise censorial statement with an alias, but to no avail. Thought Leader passes with flying colours. :)

    (Report abuse)

    Ray H on December 11th, 2007 at 4:23 pm

    @ Ray — you’ve got way too much time on your hands ;-)

    (Report abuse)

    Matthew Buckland on December 18th, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    This days times have changed people look at the media in a different way they don’t care much about television that why u find people don’t notice the adverts on TV because they spend their time on the internet reading magazines, news paper and especially the I pots have all the futures on them like radio, movies and act. Internets play big roles this day.

    (Report abuse)

    south African website awards on January 26th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    Leave a Reply

    All comments must be approved by our editors, click here to read the editorial guidelines for comments. Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.

    Send me the Thought Leader daily newsletter

    We have put a word limit of 250 words on all your comments


    words left

    profile
    Arthur Goldstuck is a South African journalist, media analyst and commentator on information and communications technology (ICT), internet and mobile communications and technologies. Goldstuck heads the World Wide Worx research organisation, and has led research into ICT issues such as the effects of IT on small business, the role of mobile technologies in business and government, and the technology challenges of the financial services sector. He regularly provides strategic insights and guidance on trends at conferences and corporate events across Africa.
    Tell a Friend Technorati RSS
    Arthur's links
    Legends From a Small Country
    Revisiting and updating the urban legends that have appeared in Arthur Goldstuck's various books, and monitoring new ones as they appear and disappear from the psyche. The focus is on South African urban legends, but sometimes goes global.
    Little Blog
    Little Blog is a 5-year old human being who exhibits all the characteristics of a blog. Very often, her worldview suggests a far more interesting world than that experienced by her Official Adults.
    The Big Change
    The Big Change is a business strategy blog and newsletter published by Arthur Goldstuck.
    more posts
    EASSy, the second of nine new undersea telecommunications cables to connect sub-Saharan Africa to the rest of the world by 2011, will make landfall in...
    It's not a pretty sound. The Local Organising Committee for World Cup 2010 whining about the slow pace of ticket sales is a little like football teams...
    Two ads in the latest Sunday Times were seemingly innocuous: six posts advertised for Broadband Infraco and 13 for the Department of Home Affairs. But...
    It can be enormously confusing when you first set out to liberate yourself. Having a full-featured office that is not an office at all is a contradict...
    It's difficult today to grasp that just 20 years ago most of us were stuck in the same office set-up that had ruled the business world for a century. ...
    latest activity
    Blog Statistics
    Total reads 107773
    Total comments 617
    Arthur's tags
    advertisement
        Mail & Guardian Online Headlines
    • National
    • Business
    • Africa
    • World
    • Sport
    All material copyright of the author, or the Mail & Guardian, unless otherwise specified
    Author Login
    Afrigator